FT article: Michael Jackson estate says accuser is trying to extract $213mn

Now, is it possible the estate know about the cascios pimping false songs and thought they were shady AF - and decided to make sure they could never backstab MJ again in the type of way Robson & Safechuck did?

If the estate thought the cascios could possible turn when they demanded money for positive stories, then they might have reasoned 16 million is small money to make sure we dont have another Leaving Neverland and MJs legacy is dead!

Its a bit of a stretch, but also not impossible to phantom with everything at stake, the settlement money is pocket change compared to all the money the Estate is making that they would not if we had another Leaving Neverland.

The Cascios however has ZERO credibility either way, starting to blackmail the estate when they had received almost all the money, fecking cockroaches!

---
Will someone close to the estate be able to clarify what exactly is going on, its insane that we have to have all this speculation and no facts! If you are leaking a story make sure they get it right so the story does not have to be repeated time after time and change etc.
 
Last edited:
I hope the entire situation turns out to be just an elaborate fake news story. Even though it remains strange, didn't Frank Cascio's best friend recently tweet something against Michael, which would 'confirm' the veracity of the article?
 
Will someone close to the estate be able to clarify what exactly is going on, its insane that we have to have all this speculation and no facts! If you are leaking a story make sure they get it right so the story does not have to be repeated time after time and change etc.
Yeah, isn't there some way to contact the Estate and ask whether or not the article is true? Or maybe contact Taj or TJ or anyone who can get in touch with the Estate?
 
Keep Janet tweets and your personal views about US politics in its own thread because some people are not interested in that topic. In democracy, people can vote for whoever they want, including Janet and Randy Jackson. Thanks.
Thanks

So annoying to see mj fans on either side just assuming everyone supports their chosen candidate.

Talk about narcissism.
 
Are people suggesting that the Financial Times are lying when they state at the end of their article that they were in contact with the Estate, thus opening themselves up to major legal issues with an Estate that has proven to have a devastating legal arsenal?
 
Back
Top