analogue
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 8,334
- Points
- 113
I've been noticing this a lot lately
You have two sides of an argument. One side says that there are certain things comedians should't be able to joke about (E.G rape and child molestation) because those types of jokes are sick and disgusting. And then there's the other side who says that there should be no limit to what a comedian can joke about, and that the whole point of comedy is to Russel some feathers (I disagree with that, because I thought the whole point of comedy was to make people laugh). And if anyone objects to a comedian joking about a sensitive topic, then that person is an uptight jerk who can't take a joke.
I'd like to hear people's thoughts on this.
You have two sides of an argument. One side says that there are certain things comedians should't be able to joke about (E.G rape and child molestation) because those types of jokes are sick and disgusting. And then there's the other side who says that there should be no limit to what a comedian can joke about, and that the whole point of comedy is to Russel some feathers (I disagree with that, because I thought the whole point of comedy was to make people laugh). And if anyone objects to a comedian joking about a sensitive topic, then that person is an uptight jerk who can't take a joke.
I'd like to hear people's thoughts on this.