Blame the victim-about rape

MIST

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
5,343
Points
83
"11-Year-Old Girl Gang-Raped By 18 Men In Texas"

"In a story that is horrifying both because of its content and the media coverage that has followed in its aftermath, 18 young men and teenage boys, some as young as middle-schoolers, were arrested in the town of Cleveland, Texas, for gang-raping an 11-year-old girl last November. The police learned about the assault last November, when one of the girl’s elementary-school classmates told her teacher that she had seen a cellphone video of the attack.

According to an affidavit, which cited photos and videos as proof, the girl was offered a ride by a 19-year-old man, who took her to his house, forced her to disrobe, and along with several other men, sexually assaulted her. She was then taken to an abandoned mobile home, where the rest of the assaults occurred. Several of the attackers documented the event on their phones.

All of this is now just hitting the news. New York Times reporter James McKinley Jr.’s approach, which focuses on the way that the East Texas community has reacted to the assaults, is problematic, insensitive, and victim-blaming. It paints the attackers as well-meaning “boys” who were “drawn into” the horrible violence, and describes the victim as dressing “older than her age, wearing makeup and fashions more appropriate to a woman in her 20s.” Although the alleged attackers are only now being arrested, and a trial has yet to commence, the coverage seems to indict the victim as if not more severely than the men who repeatedly raped an 11-year-old girl, while taking videos on their cellphones.

As Shakespeare’s Sister points out, by the fourth paragraph of the NYT article we know a significant number of details about the attackers; the victim has yet to figure in the story aside from her gender and age. McKinley quotes a woman who is dismayed at the idea that “these boys have to live with this the rest of their lives.” Of course, the trauma of being raped by almost twenty men is made to seem negligable by comparison.

To make matters worse, the description of the victim plainly implies that she was a deviant figure. She had been “visiting friends” in the neighborhood near the abandoned trailer in the months before her assault, and sometimes hung out with teenage boys near a playground. According to the woman quoted above, this means that the assault was the girl’s mother’s fault.

“Where was her mother? What was her mother thinking?” she said. “How can you have an 11-year-old child missing down in the Quarters?”

McKinley then launches into a description of the town’s economic depression, and describes the trailer’s bleak interior. Instead of the story of a violent crime perpetrated by adults and minors against another minor, this angle encourages us to feel sorry for the small town that has been “shaken to its core.” The attackers are equally victims, and the victim is for the most part absent. The word “rape” is only used a few times in the article, the fact that the girl could not have consented is mentioned nowhere, and the tragedy is not that an 11-year-old girl was subjected to unspeakable violence, but that the “town” (represented through the one person quoted) doesn’t know how to react.

The Houston Chronicle‘s coverage is equally bad. Describing the victim’s Facebook postings, Cindy Horswell writes,

“Sometimes she comes across like a little girl, such as when she talks of her special talent for making “weird sound effects” and “running in circles” to overcome nervousness.

But she also makes flamboyant statements about drinking, smoking and sex. Yet her vulnerability pokes through the tough veneer as she tells of “being hurt many times,” where she “settled for less” and “let people take advantage” and “walk all over” her. She vows to learn from her mistakes.”

As Margaret Hartmann writes on Jezebel, “Publishing information like that would be wrong if the victim was an adult, and it’s totally reprehensible in the case of a victim who “comes across like a little girl,” because that’s exactly what she is.” The idea that this girl needs to “learn from her mistakes” is absurdly offensive. It baldly implies that because of her actions, she was raped.

There’s one acceptable response to all of this coverage, and it’s outrage. As Liz Henry passionately writes, “The media is reporting on how she dresses, what the town thinks of how she dresses, where she hangs out, whether she cusses on her Facebook page… ALL COMPLETELY NOT RELEVANT to her being kidnapped and brutally gang raped.”

This is a story about a child who was kidnapped by an adult and forced to have sexual intercourse with a large number of men. The act was recorded and somehow made its way back to her elementary-school classmates. These are the events that McKinley, Horswell and other reporters should be writing about – not about the town’s economic decline, and certainly not what the neighbors think about the victim or her mother."



Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/11-year-old-girl-gang-raped-by-18-men-in-texas.html#ixzz1g7xgvobA


Why should it matter if a girl look older than she is, wear short skirts etc there is never an excuse for rape,and be raped by so many men/boys that´s terrible.
But the society blames the victim, this isn´t the only case.
 
Women Raped, Tortured and Beaten at Clothing Factory in Jordan

Have you ever shopped at Wal-Mart, Target, Macy’s, Kohl’s Lands’ End, or Hanes?

Chances are you probably have, but did you know you were supporting companies that rape, torture and beat thousands of women in their factories?

According to a report from the Institute of Global Labour and Human Rights, thousands of Southeast Asian young women working at the Classic Factory in Jordan, which manufactures clothing for some of the biggest brand names sold in the U.S., have been victims of repeated sexual and physical abuse.

A six-month undercover investigation reveals horrifying findings:
A standard shift is 13 hours a day, 6-7 days a week
Women work over 18 hour shifts to finish clothing that must be shipped to the U.S.
Some women only make 61 cents an hour
Women are routinely cursed at, hit, and shortchanged of their wages
Women are groped and fondled by managers to get them to work faster
Women are repeatedly raped by upper management (one woman’s assailant, a manager, bit her entire body leaving scars)
Women who refuse sexual advances are beaten and deported
Women who become pregnant are forcibly returned to their home countries
These abuses are best described by one of the women herself:
<iframe width="480" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/QNQdriLXJCI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></ifram

Anil Santha, a Production Manager at the Classic Factory in Jordan, has been identified as one of the perpetrators of the sexual and physical abuse the woman face. Santha was arrested to face charges of rape and torture but was mysteriously freed after just two days. He returned back to work at a Classic factory as if nothing had happened to continue raping, abusing and torturing women again.



Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/women-r...clothing-factory-in-jordan.html#ixzz1gRUkD7tB
 
Ehm...she's 11. It doesn't matter how inappropriately she was dressed. She is still an eleven year old girl, which means she has the physique of an eleven year old child. I don't know if Texans have seen eleven year olds lately, but the bodies of eleven year old girls are not exactly developed and are therefore not conductive for sexual activity. The girl in question is barely pubescent, I would even say pre-pubescent, since puberty usually starts to hit at around 12-13 years.

What does this mean? This means the intercourse in question was especially painful and unpleasant to this poor girl, who was basically lured by an adult man into the situation. The adult man should have known better than to do that, and although the girl may have made some poor decisions [boarding a stranger's car], it is the adults who are responsible for what happened that day, not the child.

It is always difficult when one talks about rape--there is either thoroughly inappropriate victim-blaming (such as in this case), or a reluctance to have the alleged victim be accountable for extraneous transgressions (an adult woman under 21 who gets drunk and is "raped" [totally wasted people can't consent to sexual activity, thus it is considered rape] not be charged for underage drinking, and basically hold the upper hand against the man accused, who could have been just as drunk but does not get the same treatment on account of being male).

I'm not in the bandwagon of people who are particularly sympathetic towards alleged rape victims without a crime being proven, but it is clear as day the boys and men are to blame in this particular case, and I find it utterly unfathomable and horrifying that Texans are actually attempting to pin the blame on an eleven year old girl.
 
I don´t know what I did but I can only read part of the thread
Here is another victim in Jordan
<iframe width="480" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/b21WksSA3og" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Trafficking Victim or Criminal? Depends on Your Age

This guest blog is from Kevin Ryan, President of Covenant House. One of the largest privately-funded childcare agencies in the U.S., Covenant House provides services to homeless and runaway youth. Want to make a difference in the life of homeless kid? “Like” Covenant House below and help raise public awareness about the very serious problems facing young people in America.




As President of Covenant House, I know all too well the dark realities of the human trafficking industry. Many young victims find their way to Covenant House after they escape capture, have been freed by police raids or have made contact with Covenant House outreach staff who comb the streets day and night looking for kids in danger.

If you want to truly understand the horrors that young trafficking victims must endure, please visit our Abolish Child Trafficking microsite to read their stories.

Their words — along with three compelling articles that recently appeared in the New York Times — remind me of the importance of working together as we fight for the lives of homeless kids with no voice of their own.

One of these articles was a heart tugging account of a young woman sold into prostitution from the age of 13 who is seeking to have her criminal record of past prostitution offenses vacated so she can move forward with her life.

Another was a horrifying account of a still at-large serial killer preying on prostituted women. And the third was a welcomed statement that New York State’s Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman is calling for a new approach to juvenile justice that would transfer jurisdiction for 16 and 17 year olds accused of less serious crimes from the state’s criminal courts to family court where rehabilitation takes priority over retribution.

The first article’s relationship to human trafficking is obvious. A child of thirteen being bought and sold to the highest bidder is sickening. A 13 year old simply cannot consent to sexual activity. Federal law therefore makes it perfectly clear that there is no such thing as a child prostitute, but rather there are far too many sexually exploited children used for the commercial gain of others. States have been too slow to follow suit. The fact that this young woman, now 22 and trying to rebuild her life, must answer yes to questions on job applications about whether she has ever been a convicted of a crime is absurd. Thanks to a 2010 New York state law allowing the prostitution convictions of trafficking victims to be overturned, this injustice may finally be corrected.

The article about the serial killer reminds us about the terrible violence that exploited women endure in daily life. These victims are real life people with loved ones, who faced not only a brutal death but most likely lives of violence. And although the victims of this killer may have been adults at the time of their death, the odds are high that they were once sexually exploited children.

Fortunately the third article, discussing a move from adult criminal court to family court for 16- and 17-year-old offenders was filled with logic and common sense. This is good news for many of the young people we see at Covenant House whose lives have been filled with adversity and abuse which can lead to the making of wrong choices. Let’s give young adults the rehabilitative services they need instead of saddling them with criminal records that will make it even harder to choose a new path.

Although this will be a positive change for all of the young people we see at Covenant House, it is especially welcome for all victims of commercial sexual exploitation. I have been somewhat frustrated that New York’s Safe Harbor for Sexually Exploited Youth Act, which was designed to treat minor victims of commercial sexual exploitation as victims instead of criminals, does not truly help 16 and 17 year olds. Although the law was written with the intent to help commercially sexually exploited children under age 18, the law’s mechanism converts juvenile delinquency petitions to Persons In Need of Supervision petitions, a less punitive and more rehabilitative form of petition. Yet because children must be under age 16 to have a juvenile delinquency petition in family court in the first place, the law has little impact on 17 and 18 year olds.

At what age does a child who was commercially sexually exploited at 13 turn into a criminal or prostitute, simply by the passage of time? The trafficked young people we see at Covenant House may be as old as 21, but to me they are no more culpable than the exploited children they once were. The only thing they are guilty of is that no one offered them the help they needed before the clock ran out and they hit the age majority. All commercially exploited young people should be treated as victims instead of criminals regardless of the number of candles on their birthday cake. I will welcome the chance to see New York’s courts treat 16 and 17 year olds as the children they are — and have the right to be.



Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/trafficking-victim-or-criminal-depends-on-your-age.html#ixzz1gtkRsqVS


My interpretation of Hollywood tonight is that the girl didn´t succeed there.She was alone and scared without money to a ticket home.
I think she was offered "help" unaware of what kind of people it was and she became a victim in sexindustry
 
South Africa's lesbians fear 'corrective rape'By Pumza Fihlani

BBC News, Cape Town

Lesbian South Africans are living in fear as rape and murder become a daily threat in the townships they call home.

Noxolo Nkosana, 23, is the latest victim of a series of violent attacks against lesbians.

She was stabbed a stone's throw from her home in Crossroads township, Cape Town, as she returned from work one evening with her girlfriend.

The two men - one of whom lives in her community - started yelling insults.

"They were walking behind us. They just started swearing at me screaming: 'Hey you lesbian, you tomboy, we'll show you,'" Ms Nkosana tells the BBC.

Before she knew it a sharp knife had entered her back - two fast jabs, then she was on the ground. Half conscious, she felt the knife sink into her skin twice more.

"I was sure that they were going to kill me," she says.

Many lesbians have died in such attacks - 31 in the last 10 years, it is reported

In April, Noxolo Nogwaza was raped by eight men and murdered in KwaThema township near Johannesburg.

The 24-year-old's face and head were disfigured by stoning, and she was stabbed several times with broken glass.

The attack on her is thought to have begun as a case of what is known as "corrective rape", in which men rape lesbians in what they see as an attempt to "correct" their sexual orientation.

The practice appears to be on the increase in South Africa.

More than 10 lesbians per week are raped or gang-raped in Cape Town alone, according to Luleki Sizwe, a charity which helps women who have been raped in the Western Cape.

Many of the cases are not reported because the victims are afraid that the police will laugh at them, or that their attackers will come after them, says Ndumie Funda, founder of Luleki Sizwe
"Many of them just suffer in silence," she says.

"The cases people read about in the media are not even the tip of the iceberg. Lesbians are under attack in South Africa's townships every day."

Reports of police ridiculing rape victims abound in the gay community.

"Some policemen in the township mock you saying: 'How can you be raped by a man if you are not attracted to them?' They ask you to explain how the rape felt. It is humiliating," says Thando Sibiya, a lesbian from Soweto.

She says she knows two people who reported rapes but then dropped their cases because of their treatment by the police.

'Un-African'

Some trace the root of the problem to pockets of traditional African society that have not accepted homosexuality - especially among women.

"African societies are still very patriarchal. Women are taught that they should marry men, anything outside of that is viewed as wrong," says Lesego Tlhwale from African gay rights group Behind the Mask.

"It is seen as un-African for two women to marry. Some men are threatened by this and then want to 'fix' it," she adds.

The Eudy Simelane case

The practice of "corrective rape" made world headlines in 2008 when Eudy Simelane, a former South African international women's footballer was gang-raped, beaten and stabbed 25 times in the face, chest and legs in KwaThema township.
One of four alleged attackers pleaded guilty to rape and murder and was sentenced to 32 years in jail. Another pleaded not guilty, but was convicted and given a life sentence. Two others were acquitted.
She notes that the women who have been killed in South Africa so far have been described as "butch lesbians" - a slang term used to describe lesbians with a masculine or manly appearance.

"They are threatened by these kinds of lesbians in particular. They say they are stealing their girlfriends. It is a warped sense of entitlement and a need to protect their manhood."

South Africa is the only African country to have legalised homosexual marriage, and one of only 10 in the world. The constitution specifically forbids discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation.

But on the ground, prejudice remains common.

On the streets of Johannesburg, it is easy to find men who support the idea of "corrective rape".

"When someone is a lesbian, it's like saying to us men that we are not good enough," Thulani Bhengu, 35, tells the BBC.

Very few cases of rape against lesbians have ever resulted in convictions.

No-one knows how many of the more than 50,000 cases of rape reported in South Africa each year are committed against gay women, because the victim's sexual orientation is not recorded.

Defiance

But after the murder of Ms Nogwaza - and a petition signed by 170,000 people around the world calling for an end to "corrective rape" - the justice department has begun to listen.

It is in the process of setting up a team to develop a strategy for tackling hate crimes against gay people, and is considering introducing heavier sentences for offences where the victim's sexual orientation is a factor in the crime.

Ms Nkosana is afraid that she might be attacked again, but says she will not be "forced back in the closet" - made to pretend that she is a heterosexual.

"They made me a victim in my own neighbourhood but I won't let them win," she says. "They can't stop me from being who I am."

But despite her defiant attitude, Ms Tlhwale says many South African lesbians are deeply worried.

"Everyone is scared," she says. "We have seen an increase in attacks against lesbians in recent months. Everyone we speak to is afraid that they might be next."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-13908662
 
Back
Top