Thaaaat's right I remember that now! Can't believe her original stance left my mind, I guess because she was decent enough to make up for her errors unlike most of the others.She was one of the ones that thought mj was guilty at first then as the trial went on she realised that mj was in fact innocent
There was an interview with her on youtube and she said '' wait a mintue things dont add upThaaaat's right I remember that now! Can't believe her original stance left my mind, I guess because she was decent enough to make up for her errors unlike most of the others.
I never heard that, but I saw one fairly recent interview she did, maybe this year or last, on YouTube. The guy speaking with Aphrodite was clearly trying to back her into a corner, and every time she dodged his questions, he became more determined. When he finally asked her point-blank, "Do you think he ever hurt any kids?", she simply shrugged and said, "I don't know."Yeah, she was one of the few journalists that had some fairness back in the day. But if you listen to the podcast "Think Twice" (please don't though because its bias) she says (or the interview was edited in order to fit the narrative of the podcast) that she does believe MJ was innocent when it comes to the Arvizos, but not so much regarding the Chandlers.