Arckangel
Proud Member
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2019
- Messages
- 120
- Points
- 18
As we all know, Michael Jackson was heterosexual. Some author suggested he was gay, but that's just speculation. Jackson explained how the press made up a lot of lies about him incl. allegations of homosexuality in order to turn the public against him. Jackson explained in a song how the press will falsely call people a "homosexual" or a "bisexual". True! But I'm now reading from a Jackson hater in the thread linked above that he was a homophobe... I don't believe that for a second (it's complete bollocks), but I have a question. Has Jackson ever had any LGBT friend? Has he ever said anything in support of LGBT?
Labelling a thread 'Michael Jackson - Paedophile (Continued)' does not constitute abusive behaviour, accusing MJ of paedophilia, cussing him out, saying he needs to rot in Hell, etc. does not constitute abusive behaviour, telling an MJ supporter (also a Madonna fan): "**** OFF PEDO APOLOGIST" does not constitute abusive behaviour, calling all MJ supporters (incl. Madonna's own fans) pedophile apologists is not abusive behaviour, but standing up to MJ in a polite and civilized manner, providing arguments and sources constitutes "abusive behavior", and I've got a one-day suspension and a warning. They can go f*@# themselves for all I care.
Trust me, I was very polite to all of them (no insults, no personal attacks), I made good points and provided sources. To the one that cussed at me, I asked them to take their "**** off" where the sun don't shine. If THAT's what that mod sees as "abusive behavior", then they have a problem. Maybe the mod took issue w/ the nicknames I came up for those crooks: ROBson, SafeCHECK and Dan GREED, but all those members can insult MJ in the foulest ways possible, and that's proper behaviour?
I've never had any issue on that board except when I discuss anything political in the 'General Topics' section. Some people are like that; if you don't agree w/ them at 100% on a particular topic, they will get very angry, will insult you, throw a fit but accuse YOU of acting improperly. Pathetic at best, and I don't give a ****! They've lost a member.
Labelling a thread 'Michael Jackson - Paedophile (Continued)' does not constitute abusive behaviour, accusing MJ of paedophilia, cussing him out, saying he needs to rot in Hell, etc. does not constitute abusive behaviour, telling an MJ supporter (also a Madonna fan): "**** OFF PEDO APOLOGIST" does not constitute abusive behaviour, calling all MJ supporters (incl. Madonna's own fans) pedophile apologists is not abusive behaviour, but standing up to MJ in a polite and civilized manner, providing arguments and sources constitutes "abusive behavior", and I've got a one-day suspension and a warning. They can go f*@# themselves for all I care.
Trust me, I was very polite to all of them (no insults, no personal attacks), I made good points and provided sources. To the one that cussed at me, I asked them to take their "**** off" where the sun don't shine. If THAT's what that mod sees as "abusive behavior", then they have a problem. Maybe the mod took issue w/ the nicknames I came up for those crooks: ROBson, SafeCHECK and Dan GREED, but all those members can insult MJ in the foulest ways possible, and that's proper behaviour?
I've never had any issue on that board except when I discuss anything political in the 'General Topics' section. Some people are like that; if you don't agree w/ them at 100% on a particular topic, they will get very angry, will insult you, throw a fit but accuse YOU of acting improperly. Pathetic at best, and I don't give a ****! They've lost a member.
Last edited by a moderator: