[Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror / New assult Pg 38

rsggamer123

Proud Member
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
962
Points
0
Location
A, A
Secret FBI files exclusively seen by the Sunday People reveal Michael Jackson spent £23million buying the silence of at least two dozen young boys he abused over 15 years.

The documents – case numbers CADCE MJ-02463 and CR 01046 – were not passed on to prosecutors in the King of Pop’s 2005 trial, when he was cleared of molesting a child.

But they throw a disturbing new light on the megastar’s insistence he never laid a finger on any of the scores of kids he invited to his home for unsupervised sleep-overs.

Agents have thousands of pages of evidence dating back to 1989 indicating ***** groomed and molested children – sometimes right under the noses of their starstruck parents.

The FBI files include private investigators’ reports, phone transcripts and hours of audio tapes.

They describe how the Thriller hit-maker was once caught by a member of his household staff groping a world-famous child star, watching porn films while molesting another boy and fondling the genitals of a third in his private cinema.

The mother of one of the youngsters was sitting two or three rows in front of them at the time – unaware of the vile abuse her son was suffering.

Ironically, many of the damning reports in the FBI collection had been commissioned by ***** himself.

Terrified the parents of boys who spent nights with him at his Neverland ranch might go to the cops or expose him in the media, the desperate singer hired “private eye to the stars” Anthony Pellicano to target potential skeletons in his closet – and make sure they stayed out of the limelight.

But when Pellicano was investigated himself in 2002 for bugging Hollywood stars such as Sylvester Stallone, the FBI seized all his files – including many about Jackson. It is copies of these to which the Sunday People has had exclusive access.

The latest revelations about *****’s lurid past come as his private life is once again in the spotlight – even though four years have passed since he died from heart failure aged 50.

His family are currently suing gig promoters AEG Live for £26billion, claiming they hired Dr Conrad Murray, who gave ***** the dose of the anaesthetic propofol that killed him.

AEG deny employing Murray, now serving a four-year jail term for involuntary manslaughter.

The files will also dismay *****’s kids Prince, 16, Paris, 15, and 11-year-old Blanket, who have not yet come to terms with losing their father.

In fact, Paris tried to kill herself by slashing her wrists just three weeks ago and is still in hospital.

But there is yet more shocking news for the singer’s family – Jackson’s former child pal Wade Robson, a dancer and once one of his most stalwart defenders, has just launched a major lawsuit against his estate.

Robson, now 30, claims he was often molested at Neverland during his regular visits to the infamous ranch during the 1990s.

The Aussie-born choreographer for pop stars such as Britney Spears and Demi Lovato claims the abuse started when he was only seven and continued until he was 14.


Michael Jackson FBI files

Michael Jackson FBI files

Michael Jackson FBI files

Michael Jackson FBI files

Michael Jackson FBI files

Michael Jackson FBI files



The files seen by this newspaper appear to confirm Robson’s claim to be one of many child victims who were invited to fulfil Jackson’s sick fantasies at his isolated playground in the Californian countryside.

Pellicano is now behind bars serving a 15-year jail sentence for racketeering and wire-tapping.

But one of his senior snoops – who worked extensively on the Jackson case – has broken his silence to speak exclusively to the Sunday People.

The investigator, whose name we are withholding, said he was among those quizzed by FBI agents probing his old boss. And he kept copies of many of the Jackson documents now held in the bureau’s archives.

The paedophile allegations – sandwiched between thousands of pages of information about Jackson, his career and his accusers – include inter-views with ex-aides who claim their boss was fixated with child porn.

The files name 17 boys – including five child actors and two dancers – ***** singled out for abuse.

Other kids the singer preyed on include a European boy and the sons of a screenwriter.

At least three boys got hush-money, the investigator said, with the family of one well-known young film actor *being given £392,000 “to refrain from any and all contact with media and communications, newspapers, television, radio, film and books”.

The gagging order also insisted there would not be any attempt now or in the future to “extort, intimidate, harass or impede” the Jackson organisation.

A maid who worked for the singer at Neverland was said to have been paid off with about £1.3million after complaining her son had been abused by her employer. And the investigator told of one shocking case of a mother who knew her young son was being molested by Jackson “but turned a blind eye to it because if it didn’t bother him, it didn’t bother her”.

Many of the files on the victims – whose names are not being published for legal reasons – were originally pulled together by lawyers drawing up a list of a potential threats to Jackson’s paedophile secret in the early 1990s.

The legal team was scrambled after the dentist dad of 13-year-old Jordan Chandler went public with claims his son had been abused – opening the door to a string of accusations involving other kids.

The sleuth who worked for Pellicano said: “Around 1993 things were really heating up. The suggestions were Jordie was not the only victim. The momentum became so great Jackson needed a private investigator to go straight for the jugular and produce results.

“His actress friend Elizabeth Taylor encouraged him to hire Pellicano *because she had used him to stop dirt on her drug problems being released in the media – Pellicano was a master of negotiation and keeping stars’ *reputations clean.

“I was hired by him to find out where the fires needed putting out and, in this case, where allegations would be coming from.

“But I have never worked on a case with as many potential claimants as the Jackson case.”

The investigator, who spent two years on the case, saw Pellicano’s ruthless methods first-hand in the frantic bid to salvage Jackson’s Mr Clean image.

He said his boss encouraged his extensive contacts in the media to call the singer’s victims after he paid them off so they could publicly deny he ever touched them. It was part of a relentless campaign to clear the megastar’s name.

The investigator said: “There was a mountain of allegations levelled at Jackson and Pellicano was determined to prove his client innocent.

“He promised Jackson, ‘I can make this go away’ and he wanted me to dig up everything that was around on him and then began smoothing it over.

“Pellicano had links to key figures in the US media and made them dance to his tune. He was very good at starting fires – but also at putting them out. By the end we had at least 10 boxes of documents about Jackson.”

He went on: “The FBI had all that information long before Jackson’s 2005 trial. I’m surprised this evidence never came to light.

“Then again, if the pay-offs were successfully executed, no one would have spoken.

“At the time, Jackson was on a world tour, battling drug addiction and planning his next CD and future.

“If these files had been released then, Jackson’s career would have been over. But he was the King of Pop and spending the equivalent of a year’s royalties was worth it to keep him on his throne. With the help of people like Pellicano, the world and his fans never heard what took place at Neverland over 15 years.”

At his 2005 trial, Jackson was acquitted of abusing and feeding *alcohol to a 13-year-old boy who had survived cancer. But the private eye said: “Our reports painted the picture that Jackson was a serial child predator.

“It showed at least two dozen children were given money to stay quiet – which came to around *$35million (£23million).

“Wade Robson was one of the kids identified as a victim while our reports show many others were paid off before their names even emerged.”



He said the pay-out total includes the £13million settlement to Jordie Chandler and up to £4.5million in legal and investigation fees. The investigator added: “I haven’t released this now to upset Michael’s children, who haven’t done anything wrong.

“But when Wade’s case was announced, I felt it was time the public knew what information had been *collected, what the authorities have – and what has never been released.”

Brian Oxman, a long-time Jackson family lawyer and friend, said yesterday he was not aware that Michael “paid off” any boys other than Jordan Chandler.

He said: “The only money I know about was Jordan Chandler. But the gift list on Michael’s income tax returns was astounding. He would give out a great deal of money and top of the list was Elizabeth Taylor. He gave money to a whole series of people. It happened all the time.

“I wasn’t aware of any pay-offs to kids. I never heard him talking about it.”

Source: Mirror
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

^uhm, what.

edit: looked at the files, don't look official at all. Michael's FBI file came out a couple years ago....what's this crap?
 
Last edited:
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I just hope*, I meant. Oops!

What the f*ck is that article! The original FBI files stated the opposite and and they were investigating more than 10 years and didn't find a sole evidence of such disgusting claims. And also why the f*ck all those alledged victims didn't testify in 2005? I'm sure it comes from a disgusting tabloid, I don't buy it for a second!
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I just hope*, I meant. Oops!

What the f*ck is that article! The original FBI files stated the opposite and and they were investigating more than 10 years and didn't find a sole evidence of such disgusting claims. And also why the f*ck all those alledged victims didn't testify in 2005? I'm sure it comes from a disgusting tabloid, I don't buy it for a second!

Yes. And why would there be two sets of files released. Why was Michael never arrested on federal charges if the FBI had all that proof including so-called evidence of him bribing "victims" and their parents to keep quiet? I'm sure they would have never known about all that "criminal" stuff for years and years and not done anything about it. They would have built a federal case against him if they really had all of that evidence. I don't believe this at all.
 
Last edited:
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Yeah. What is going on there? Why would there be two sets of files released.

And why wouldn't they hand them over to the prosecution in the '05 trial if there was so much incriminating evidence and they could have gotten this "criminal" once and for all?
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Wow, what took them so long? This is obvious, some idiots making up stories to fit this whole WR situation and make some money selling their made up bullsh*t. And nothing that is in the 'evidence' is actually proof of anything that is being said in this story..:smilerolleyes: :lol:
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

This is so disgusting. The FBI released its files on MJ years ago and said they never found anything incriminating in all the time they investigated him. Why on earth would they keep this information from the prosecution in 2005, isn't that a crime in and of itself?

Filthy tabloids. This kind of slander should be illegal.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

^the estate should sue. That would show everyone that they mean business.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I even remember Sneddon begging publicly for more victims to come forward and never appeared. That's why that article is a complete bullshit.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

If the FBI all this information, when it could have been used in 2005, when sneddon the lapd and the fbi was looking for any and every thing to use against MJ. All this BS is put together to boost wade robson claim.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

If the FBI all this information, when it could have been used in 2005, when sneddon the lapd and the fbi was looking for any and every thing to use against MJ. All this BS is put together to boost wade robson claim.

Yes. Look at Pellicano. Didn't they bring federal charges against him in no time? If they had all that proof against Michael, they would have done the same with him. Period.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

of course that's bs... The FBI released the files saying everything was 'unfounded' and his 20 computers had no child porn on them at all.. Please make the estate aware of this and also T-Mez.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

how can we get hold of the estate or tmez regarding this new 'information' ??
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

why didn't they put the link to the files so every one can see and read for themselves.
 
Don't forget that

Was There an Unknown ***** Accuser?

By Roger Friedman

Published March 25, 2005

| FoxNews.com

advertisement

Michael Jackson | Kathleen Turner

Was There an Unknown ***** Accuser?

Was there a kid who made a deal with Michael Jackson before his first accuser settled with the pop star for $20 million in 1993?

Tape recordings left behind by a deceased National Enquirer reporter would suggest there was, but on closer inspection, it turns out there probably wasn't.

In fact, the tapes show that there was a zealous push on the part of the supermarket tabloids 12 years ago to find any boy who might have been abused by Jackson.

This will be a disappointment for Santa Barbara County District Attorney Tom Sneddon, who has not been able to produce any other Jackson "victims" so far.

On Monday, Judge Rodney Melville will hold a hearing to determine whether or not Jackson's "prior" acts can be brought into this trial.

If they are allowed, what could they be and where did they come from? And are they real?

Sneddon is prepared to subpoena every ex-Jackson employee and cop who was involved in the first case, even those who've since sold their stories to the tabloids. The result could be a veritable list of the supermarket tabs' sources and leakers from a dozen years ago.

Like a tabloid Richard Nixon, National Enquirer and Globe writer Jim Mitteager taped most of his conversations about Jackson when he covered the story in 1993-94.

Mitteager, who was later dismissed from the papers for sexual harassment, talks to his sources and his editors very candidly.

The result is a revealing look at how the tabs salivated to get the most salacious story about Jackson, often disregarding the exact truth for kernels of plausible items that could be inflated into screaming front-page headlines.

Mitteager bequeathed the tapes to Paul Barresi, a self-styled investigator, trusting him to "do the right thing with them." Barresi thought the tapes had value, but could not have guessed what historical importance they would acquire.

Mitteager inadvertently kept a record of much of what is in the news today concerning Hollywood's underbelly. The tapes include anecdotes about many celebrities and lawyers, as well as incarcerated private eye Anthony Pellicano, who once worked for Jackson.

Barresi has a long history of involvement with the Jackson story.

In 1993, the pop star's former cook and housekeeper, Philip and Stella LeMarque, asked him to sell their story about sexual abuse at Neverland.

The LeMarques, who were slight acquaintances of Barresi, had only worked at Neverland for about 10 months and left after the first molestation case broke in 1991.

Like many disgruntled former Jackson employees, the LeMarques are now on Sneddon's witness list. The Quindoys, another couple who also sold their story, are ready to testify as well.

But Barresi realized early on that the LeMarques were probably not telling the truth.

"I concluded that it was all about the money and not about protecting a child from a predator," he told me.

The couple, he said, began embellishing their story when they came to believe they could get $500,000 for it. In the end, they received nothing.

Barresi wound up turning over his taped interviews with the couple to then-Los Angeles District Attorney Gil Garcetti. They are now in the hands of Jackson's prosecutor.

The coup de grace, Barresi says, happened later, when he listened to Mitteager's tapes. On one of them, it's noted that the LeMarques had tried to sell their story of child molestation at Neverland long before the first case broke in 1991.

"They couldn't get any takers," recalls Barresi. "But why didn't they just go to the police?"

Often the Globe printed stories, written by Mitteager, that were based on the flimsiest of evidence.

Mitteager, at least in the case of Jackson, relied heavily on a sketchy stringer named Taylea Shea. Her veracity consequently became integral to a lot of tabloid reporting at the time.

Shea, who seems to have gone by a number of aliases and had a long list of addresses and phone numbers, could not be contacted for this story, despite many tries.

Neighbors at the Los Angeles address at which she lived the longest do not remember her fondly. They recall a hustler and con woman who was always on the take.

"She should be in jail, if she hasn't been already," one former friend and neighbor said.

On one tape, Shea reads what sounds convincingly like a legal document drawn up between Jackson and a 12-year-old boy named Brandon P. Richmond, who is represented by his mother, Eva Richmond.

Brandon, according to the document, received $600,000 from Jackson. He and Jackson would no longer have any contact with each other.

Shea read the document, which is dated July 1992, to Mitteager the following year.

This would have been a blockbuster, if true, because it would make Brandon, not the differently-named boy who settled with Jackson in 1993, the first of Jackson's accusers.

Shea also says on the tape that the legal document came from the offices of famed Hollywood lawyer Bert Fields, Jackson's attorney at the time.

No reason is given why Jackson and Brandon Richmond should be separated. The implication, however, is clear.

The Globe published the story without using names. Over time, it was assumed that Brandon P. Richmond was in fact Brandon Adams, a boy who had appeared in Jackson's "Moonwalker" video.

Discussions on the tapes indicate that the tabloids also believed the two Brandons were one and the same. But there's a problem with Shea's story: Nothing adds up.

For one thing, a source close to Fields says the document uses language uncommon to their usual agreements.

Then there's the actual family.

According to the Adamses, whom I met in January, they don't know an Eva Richmond.

Brandon Adams' mother is named Marquita Woods. And Brandon's grandmother assures me she knows nothing of a $600,000 payment. The family has lived in a modest home in Baldwin Hills, Calif., for 30 years.

Brandon Adams, who is now 25, is a struggling actor. He appeared in "D2: The Mighty Ducks" and the indie film "MacArthur Park," and is currently working on building a music career.

"I wish I had $600,000," he said. "I'm broke."

The Adamses pointed out that Brandon never visited Neverland, just the Jackson family home in Encino.

For a short time they were friendly not only with the Jacksons, but with Sean Lennon and his mother Yoko Ono, who were also part of "Moonwalker." But the relationship seems to have ended well before Taylea Shea's big scoop.

Was Shea simply lying to Mitteager to collect a big fee? It would seem so.

On the tapes, Mitteager tells an editor that Shea also has "shocking" material about David Geffen and Keanu Reeves, among others. None of it would turn out to be true, but all of it was tabloid fodder that spread to more mainstream publications for a short time.

Curiously, nobody I spoke with who worked at the tabloids could remember Shea. And her own alleged main source — an attorney then associated with the office of Larry Feldman, the first accuser's lawyer — insists vehemently that she did not know Shea and had little knowledge of the case anyway.

Suddenly, the value of the Mitteager tapes takes on a new meaning.

Barresi, a sometime investigator and tabloid source in the past, is aware that he's in possession of materials that demonstrate how the supermarket tabloids operated in their heyday — the era of O.J. Simpson, Jackson and other scandals.

But one tabloid editor still in the business cautioned, "Don't paint all of us with the same brush. We did a lot of excellent work on Simpson."

Indeed, though it's hard to separate them in our minds, the Globe — then under a different owner — had a much lower standard of proof than did the Enquirer in the early 1990s. And Mitteager came from the Globe's mentality, according to sources with whom I have spoken.

At one point, in running down lists of kids who'd spent time with Jackson, Mitteager rattles off the name of a boy with the conviction that Jackson, who had befriended him, must have also acted inappropriately with him.

But it was only wishful thinking on the part of a tabloid reporter.

It turns out that the boy was 9 years old in 1993 and died shortly thereafter from leukemia. He'd met Jackson through the Make-A-Wish Foundation.

Even Jackson's staunchest critics would agree that it is hard to fathom how this boy could have been the object of the singer’s romantic interests.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/2005/03/25/was-there-unknown-*****-accuser/print
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

^ That's exactly the document the Mirror are claiming is from the FBI files, but isn't. A load of bullshit rehashed.

I just can't believe they're allowed to get away with this.

The other stuff from the LeMarques is OLD and not a secret, they testified TWICE, and the Mitteager tape transcript handed in conveniently edits out the portion where Pellicano says MJ is innocent.

This is such a disgusting amount of bullshit. I'm fuming it's been allowed to be printed and will now be everywhere as "fact."
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

^ That's exactly the document the Mirror are claiming is from the FBI files, but isn't. A load of bullshit rehashed.

I just can't believe they're allowed to get away with this.

The other stuff from the LeMarques is OLD and not a secret, they testified TWICE, and the Mitteager tape transcript handed in conveniently edits out the portion where Pellicano says MJ is innocent.

This is such a disgusting amount of bullshit. I'm fuming it's been allowed to be printed and will now be everywhere as "fact."


Send this to the estate.. maybe they can sue
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

^ That's exactly the document the Mirror are claiming is from the FBI files, but isn't. A load of bullshit rehashed.

I just can't believe they're allowed to get away with this.

The other stuff from the LeMarques is OLD and not a secret, they testified TWICE, and the Mitteager tape transcript handed in conveniently edits out the portion where Pellicano says MJ is innocent.

This is such a disgusting amount of bullshit. I'm fuming it's been allowed to be printed and will now be everywhere as "fact."

Have the estate send them a ceast and desist order threatening legal action especially if it's not a legitimate FBI document. They can prove this is from a tabloid hack..
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

And why wouldn't they hand them over to the prosecution in the '05 trial if there was so much incriminating evidence and they could have gotten this "criminal" once and for all?

Yes. I seriously doubt that they would have so-called "evidence" in such a high profile case and not give it to the prosecution. There was already a lot of media and public pressure to put Michael in jail. So I just don't see the FBI not doing anything if they had concrete proof that Michael was guilty. They are too smart for that.
 
Last edited:
la_cienega;3857840 said:
^ That's exactly the document the Mirror are claiming is from the FBI files, but isn't. A load of bullshit rehashed.

I just can't believe they're allowed to get away with this.

The other stuff from the LeMarques is OLD and not a secret, they testified TWICE, and the Mitteager tape transcript handed in conveniently edits out the portion where Pellicano says MJ is innocent.

This is such a disgusting amount of bullshit. I'm fuming it's been allowed to be printed and will now be everywhere as "fact."

Not just printed, but also reported on the radio at the end of BBC News reporting late at night, when they cover 'the Sunday papers'. This is such a determined campaign by the Mirror / People with 2 major lengthy articles. There needs to be a very firm response from the Estate. This is starting to feel like 2005 all over again.
(Edit: this press campaign seems to be targeted time-wise at the official opening night of MJ ONE, as well as tying in with the Wade Robson hearings. )

This is the other UK article:


Michael Jackson enticed "lost boys" into sordid fantasy world hidden from their parents
29 Jun 2013 22:02

Shocking audio tapes from the singer’s secret FBI file offer a chilling insight into the superstar’s depravity

The “lost boys” lured to Michael Jackson’s Neverland ranch were enticed into a sordid fantasy world hidden from their parents, the Sunday People can reveal.

Shocking audio tapes from the singer’s secret FBI file offer a chilling insight into the superstar’s depravity.

They reveal how groups of kids would be invited to Jackson’s estate, where he would then isolate his prey.

The twisted star would sleep with children in a tepee as well as his bed and was even seen groping two boys.

Jackson’s sick secrets were exposed in a recorded interview with his ex-butler Philip LeMarque and wife Stella, taped on August 28, 1993 – 12 years before the star stood trial accused of molesting children.

The charges followed a TV documentary showing the singer holding hands with 13-year-old Gavin Arvizo in 2003. ***** was acquitted of seven child abuse charges in June 2005.

The couple said Jackson – who used the code name Blue Fox – would watch porn films with young boys in his private bedroom behind a secret wall in a 70-seat Neverland cinema.

They claimed the ONLY adult who ever complained about Jackson’s disappearing acts with young boys was screen legend Marlon Brando.

Stella said: “He’d come to the ranch and always see Michael playing, disappear with the children. Michael would never spend time with the adults at the ranch.

“He said, ‘What the hell is Michael doing with those kids!’’’ She said another famous guest, the late Elizabeth Taylor, “never” complained.

French-born Philip and Stella worked at Neverland in Santa Clara, California, for nine months and were the only live-in staff. The other staff were sent home at 4pm.

They were interviewed by a private investigator working for Hollywood sleuth Anthony Pellicano.

The tape was among material seized by FBI agents probing Pellicano – who was employed by Jackson to uncover the skeletons in his closet.


The following are excerpts from a copy he made of the recording:

PHILIP: The theatre is like a regular theatre. He’s got 70 seats.

STELLA: And behind the wall, he has two bedrooms. Sometimes he’d be there with the kids. I wanted to take a picture of the bedroom but couldn’t.

PHILIP: He could watch porn.

STELLA: He’d stay with the kids all night long. All night long!

PHILIP: From 7pm until eight the next morning… nine in the morning, they are still up playing around.

PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR: Where are the adults?

PHILIP: The adults are in separate buildings.

STELLA: Boy A came to see Michael… The parents were in the room smoking pot with a five-month-old baby. At the time, he was crazy about Boy A and his little brother.

PHILIP: Michael likes them young. Boy A was getting too old. The first time when Michael saw Boy A in the movie, XXXX XXXX, he told Boy A he wanted to meet him.

PI: Wait a minute. She (a former member of Jackson’s staff) makes deals with the parents?

PHILIP: She makes the deals with the parents to bring everybody… the parents with the kids to the ranch. If there are five kids, then Michael will take the one he wants.

PI: You’re saying (the Jackson staffer) brings a selection of kids for Michael to choose from? Like a pimp?

PHILIP: Yes.


STELLA: If you really like children, you like all of them, boy or girl. Not only one while the others run around.

PHILIP: We saw a little boy and girl running around the ranch at 3am. We were the ones who found them.

PI: Michael gave no attention to those he had no interest in?

PHILIP: Yes, they didn’t know where to go. The ranch is very large. The arcade... Michael invites a whole bunch of kids, boys and girls so it doesn’t sound to be unnatural. Everyone is playing and doing things. This gives Michael the chance to break one of the children away from the rest.

PI: Sounds like he has a plan that he puts in to motion, in stages.

PHILIP: First the children just go on the amusements.

PI: You mean they just play? It’s innocent?

PHILIP: Yes, but as time progresses, the next time, (the staffer) invites only the kids Michael is interested in. The activity goes on mostly in the night.

PI: Where are the damn parents! Jesus Christ!

PHILIP: The parents do their own thing. Michael and the kids sleep in the tepee.

STELLA: And Michael sleeps in the bedroom with the children he loves. That’s true.

PHILIP: There is a stairway inside Michael’s room. It leads to the guest room…no other access …where he says the children sleep, but they never do. The bedroom upstairs …the bedroom is never undone. When Boy A came, Michael told his parents, “Boy A will stay with me.” Michael has warning alarms that go off when someone is walking close to the bedroom.

PI: I want to know about the other kids. I imagine there were a few.


PHILIP: More than a few.

PI: OK, we’ll get to them but tell me what you know about Michael and Boy A.

PHILIP: (Michael) called me at 2am that night to say, “Philip, would you please bring me some French fries?” OK, I get up and I go make him some French fries. So, then I take the two-way radio and you call security and you ask, ‘Where is Blue Fox?’ They say, ‘Oh, he’s in the arcade.’ … I went around the other entrance and entered through there and that’s when I saw Michael groping the kid.

PI: Michael had his hand touching his private parts over the pants?

PHILIP: No, no, no… In the pants.

STELLA: Boy C in the cinema, Michael did the same thing with him… and the mother was two or three rows in the front.

PI: They weren’t watching porn?

STELLA: No but they were kissing.

PI: Like a peck on the cheek?

STELLA: No, like lovers. I saw them. That’s not normal.

PI: And Boy A’s father… You said he didn’t know what was going on?

STELLA: The father is an ***hole. He is only interested in the money.

PHILIP: The father did ask me one time what was happening with Michael and Boy A. Why they were with each other all the time.

STELLA: Michael took an apartment back near the studio. Michael would pick him up in the limo and they would always be together.

PHILIP: He would keep the parents busy doing things around the house. Michael would give the parents things to do and he would treat them like kings! He (a Jackson staffer) would give them whatever they wanted.

STELLA: Well, the mother of the boy from Switzerland was crying and saying, “Why does Michael always want to be with my son to sleep? Why is it I have four other children and why doesn’t he want to spend time with them, if he loves all children?”

PI: What was the mother from Switzerland doing there?

STELLA: Michael sent them tickets.

PHILIP: Michael liked variety. (laughing)

STELLA: Yes. Boy B was there very often, but then he got too old and stopped coming to the ranch.

PHILIP: He would call all the time, but Michael would say, “Tell him I’m not here.” Then he’d smile about it.

PI: A sinister reaction. That’s dark and cold.

PHILIP: Michael and Boy B watched porn together. The boy didn’t want to touch himself and Michael told him he would do it for him.

PI: Did any adults witness this?

STELLA: Yes, (Jackson staffer) saw everything. She told us… Michael

always thought everybody was stealing from him.

PI: Maybe it stems from his own guilt… from stealing young boys’ *childhoods. Any other weird behaviour or something you want to mention?

PHILIP: Michael would never let the kids look at clocks or know what day it was. He didn’t want anybody to worry about the time because it was never bedtime. Sometimes he’d be up all night with the kids.

The investigator, speaking now, said: “I don’t believe the world understood how much power and influence Jackson wielded. He could spend millions to silence anyone – and he did that with Jordie (Chandler). Back then the victims couldn’t speak for themselves. I understand some of their parents were paid money and the kids didn’t know. Now the kids are grown up, they have the chance to speak. I feel that Wade is now taking his chance to speak up.

“I hope it helps his other victims. It might even give them the courage to make a complaint to the police.”


http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/michael-jackson-enticed-lost-boys-2011607
 
Last edited:
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

This is crap from 1993 and the Le Marques were discredited after testifying twice. They were paid huge sums of money from the tabloids and their stories embellished. This was proven at trial. The estate needs to sue and send a ceast and desist letter to the BBC.. They all know this mess is from 1993 and that the ex-employees were proven liars
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

^Oh whatever with that dumb tabloid article! This doesn't prove anything! The FBI released what they did already and it was clear they HAD NO PROOF of any wrong doin from MJ! So what if they got a bunch of disgruntled/greedy ex Neverland employees talking B.S. on tape yrs ago. They never had proof of what those idiots claimed and who sold their story like the rest too. If there was any proof of their claims MJ would have been found guilty. And no way would these tapes not come in the 05 trial. I mean these people didn't even testify! SMH But, I said before others are behind these new Robson claims or jumping in to help this fool! But if won't fly in court if it even gets there?! As always all these allegations and NEVER any proof! Zzzzzzz
 
Last edited:
myosotis;3857844 said:
Not just printed, but also reported on the radio at the end of BBC News reporting late at night, when they cover 'the Sunday papers'.

I know! why did i turn onto radio 4 at the end of the midnight news to hear the front pages, i would have been fast asleep by now, instead of all riled up.


They (lamarques)were interviewed by a private investigator working for Hollywood sleuth Anthony Pellicano.

The tape was among material seized by FBI agents probing Pellicano – who was employed by Jackson to uncover the skeletons in his closet.


The following are excerpts from a copy he made of the recording:

Baressi interviewed the lamarques in 93, acting as their tabloid broker. I'm betting it's him who has sold this story to the mirror/people. He also has possession of the mitteager tapes, which detailed the $600k (£392k) payoff.

I don't imagine using the term FBI files in this tabloid story means they are official docs with fbi written all over them. I just guess that the fbi just confiscated a whole filing cabinet of pellicano's which might or might not have contained all his work on the jackson case back in 93. This private investigator has copies of stuff he worked on in the jackson case for pellicano and so when handing it over to the tabs made it sound more official by saying that the fbi have it also in their files. I don't know what significance these supposed fbi ref numbers to the docs have in the article, they cd mean anything, are the fbi going to really bother refuting this story? The fbi wd have had these docs in 02 from pellicano and they don't seem to have ended up in mj's file by 09.
 
Last edited:
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

It really is time that the allegations mess against Michael is finally brought to an end, in my opinion. After twenty years, enough is enough. In fact, enough was enough of that garbage a long time ago. Personally, I hope the Estate says something about this.
 
Last edited:
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I'm pretty sure Paul Barresi is behind it. He was the PI who interviewed the LeMarques. He never worked for Michael. He's basically a tabloid broker. And a self-confessed opportunist at that who said himself he does not care if a story is true or not as long as tabloids pay for it.

In the thread I made for resource I posted an article about what came out of the LeMarques and Barresi at the 2005 trial: http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/t...inst-Michael?p=3857882&viewfull=1#post3857882

For the record:

1) Michael FBI files do NOT contain any info which proves Michael paid off boys and parents. The FBI files are available on the FBI's official website and anyone can read them since 2009: http://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=Michael+Jackson

2) They deliberately muddy the water in this article and mix things. They mix up real FBI files (which are not incriminating) with some bogus documents of which no one knows where they come from. They are absolutely NOT in Michael's FBI files!

3) Even those added documents do not prove anything. They are e-mails about people speculating whether the lack of victims has to do with that maybe he paid off victims.

4) That e-mail about the alleged $600,000 pay-off is addressed in Roger Friedman's 2005 article that was posted in this thread already. It came from a crazy woman. The suggestion was that he molested and paid off Brandon Adams, the boy who played in Moonwalker. Brandon Adams never claimed anything like that, and always, even as an adult, remembered Michael very fondly. Back in 2005 Adams denied to Friedman that they had ever been paid off by Michael.
 
Bonnie Blue;3857856 said:
I know! why did i turn onto radio 4 at the end of the midnight news to hear the front pages, i would have been fast asleep by now, instead of all riled up.




Baressi interviewed the lamarques in 93, acting as their tabloid broker. I'm betting it's him who has sold this story to the mirror/people. He also has possession of the mitteager tapes, which detailed the $600k (£392k) payoff.

I don't imagine using the term FBI files in this tabloid story means they are official docs with fbi written all over them. I just guess that the fbi just confiscated a whole filing cabinet of pellicano's which might or might not have contained all his work on the jackson case back in 93. This private investigator has copies of stuff he worked on in the jackson case for pellicano and so when handing it over to the tabs made it sound more official by saying that the fbi have it also in their files. I don't know what significance these supposed fbi ref numbers to the docs have in the article, they cd mean anything, are the fbi going to really bother refuting this story? The fbi wd have had these docs in 02 from pellicano and they don't seem to have ended up in mj's file by 09.

Yes. Even if they come from Pellicano's FBI files, they do not prove anything. They are mainly allegations by the LeMarques which have been discredited in court in 2005. Why is it that people cannot distinguish between an allegation and a proven fact? Reminds me of when Jordan's declaration was released and people were like "it proves MJ molested him".

Nothing I have seen there proves MJ paid off boys and parents. If anything like that would have been confiscated from Pellicano it would have ended up as evidence at MJ's trial.

Of course the tabloid will not publish parts of the Mitteager tapes where Pellicano says this, for example. This was recorded in September, 1994 after Pellicano left his employment with MJ.

“PELLICANO: You have to understand something. I have nine kids. Michael [Jackson] plays with my baby. They crawl all over him. They pull his hair. They pull his nose. Sometimes he wears a bandage across his face. If I let my own kids (unintelligible) do you think there’s a chance?

MITTEAGER: Well, all things being equal, I would say, no.

PELLICANO: Not only that. If you sat this kid [Jordie Chandler] down like I did, as a matter of fact, he couldn’t wait to get up and go play video games. I said, “you don’t understand how serious this is. Your dad [Evan Chandler] is going to accuse Michael of sexual molestation. He going to say all kinds of stuff.” He [Jordie] says, “Yeah, my dad’s trying to get money.” As a matter of fact, I (unintelligible) for 45 minutes. Then I tried tricking him. I mean, I want you to know, I’m a vegetarian. I picked this kid with a fine tooth comb. So we’re there (unintelligible) with this kid... and If you sat down and talked to this kid, there wouldn’t be any doubt in your mind either. And I said Michael is all upset. We went over and over. I tried to get him to sit down and he wants to play video games while I’m sitting there. I’m sitting there with the kid’s mother [June Chandler] and David Schwartz walks in and (unintelligible) what’s this all about? And [Barry] Rothman (unintelligible) asking questions. There is no question that Rothman (unintelligible) what this is all about.”

Or the parts which document how Mitteager tried to get the Newt family to make false allegations about MJ. I won't expect the Mirror to publish those.
 
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

where can i read more of these transcripts?
 
Last edited:
Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson files claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I'm pretty sure Paul Barresi is behind it. He was the PI who interviewed the LeMarques. He never worked for Michael. He's basically a tabloid broker. And a self-confessed opportunist at that who said himself he does not care if a story is true or not as long as tabloids pay for it.

In the thread I made for resource I posted an article about what came out of the LeMarques and Barresi at the 2005 trial: http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/t...inst-Michael?p=3857882&viewfull=1#post3857882

For the record:

1) Michael FBI files do NOT contain any info which proves Michael paid off boys and parents. The FBI files are available on the FBI's official website and anyone can read them since 2009: http://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=Michael+Jackson

2) They deliberately muddy the water in this article and mix things. They mix up real FBI files (which are not incriminating) with some bogus documents of which no one knows where they come from. They are absolutely NOT in Michael's FBI files!

3) Even those added documents do not prove anything. They are e-mails about people speculating whether the lack of victims has to do with that maybe he paid off victims.

4) That e-mail about the alleged $600,000 pay-off is addressed in Roger Friedman's 2005 article that was posted in this thread already. It came from a crazy woman. The suggestion was that he molested and paid off Brandon Adams, the boy who played in Moonwalker. Brandon Adams never claimed anything like that, and always, even as an adult, remembered Michael very fondly. Back in 2005 Adams denied to Friedman that they had ever been paid off by Michael.

Excellent points. Please make sure to re-post them below these articles so that more people see them.
 
Back
Top