Open General discussion - Katherine Jackson vs AEG

Status
Not open for further replies.
So at minimum they knew CM was not very good, at most they knew he was working at night/on sleep issues.

Careful. When I said at the least AEG employees/independent contractors knew about Michael's sleep issues much earlier based on testimonies before Phillips, it caused quite a bit of grief.

Also at this point AEG did not know that MJ had insomnia. This was not known to anybody else besides MJ and CM. Both were very secretive about MJ medical conditions.

Not true. AEG employees/independent contractors have testified otherwise.
 
Not true. AEG employees/independent contractors have testified otherwise.

Whether they knew or not, did anyone know that was the essential reason behind MJ's behavior?
Kai Chase thought it was stress related, or he was rehearsing too much, others thought it may have been due to drugs and Klien treatments.

Considering what Ortega and Faye described, how many laymen would associate his behavior to a sleep disorder? The Jackson attorney has a Harvard educated sleep specialist detailing information, and saying Murray a doctor was incompetent in his particular expertise to treat it. I do think it's a stretch to expect that concert promoters would have sufficient knowledge to identify what was happening to MJ and who would be best able to treat his condition, because they didn't know really what was wrong with him.

Besides, by the time of that last meeting, that propofol concoction seemed to be causing MJ's behavior and issues moreso than the insomnia itself.
 
Given that the lawsuit is against AEG, what independent contractors such as Ortega and Payne etc. knew is irrelevant. Did AEG execs knew or not, that's the question.
 
This case will never make any sense to me from the standpoint that AEG is responsible for not being MJ’s Nanny and making sure they know how much he ate, slept and Sh—on a daily bases.
 
:bugeyed
cabecadanocomp%5B1%5D.gif





:no: *big sigh*
 
Victory22;3852469 said:
This case will never make any sense to me from the standpoint that AEG is responsible for not being MJ’s Nanny and making sure they know how much he ate, slept and Sh—on a daily bases.

I couldn't agree more. I will never understand why the judge didn't dismiss all claims. I could understand this lawsuit if Michael collapsed on stage during rehearsal (after exhibiting all the symptoms of 6/19), had no personal doctor attending to him DAILY and the autopsy listed the cause of death as cardiac arrest due to malnutrition, etc. I could see AEG being on the hook for negligence. But, I fail to see it in this case--it's such a stretch to hold AEG responsible for something they (or even Michael's TII friends) could not control.
 


Around the 45:20 minute mark, Randy Phillips testifies during the Criminal trial about the early June 2009 meeting at Michael Jackson's home concerning issues of Michael Jackson's weight and health. "Dr. Murray said that he was going to make sure that Michael Jackson had a proper diet and he was preparing these very high nutrient protein shakes." This was the highlight of the early June meeting. Murray said at the meeting that Michael Jackson was in great health and Michael Jackson's weight was fine, too.

I reiterate these points about Michael Jackson's health and his weight, in light of what Dr. Czeisler stated regarding Michael Jackson not getting a proper night's sleep in 60 day's and his point about poor nutrition in regards to Michael Jackson's use of Propofol.

Conrad Murray was concerned with Michael Jackson's diet in early June of 2009, which is why AEG Live held a meeting to address Michael Jackson's overall health and weight. Michael Jackson did have a proper diet and Conrad Murray was preparing very high nutrient protein shakes!
 
Thanks for those who tried to explain to me why all the insomnia talk... however I stick with my frusteration and what I said before, to me that's all speculation.
What Ortega described in his emails, what Faye described in the stand, even the rapid weight loss in the months before his death... that can all be speculated about only.

I personally do not even see nutrition really a center of any problem Michael might suffer at all? My brain works the way that it keeps in mind what is proven: The coroners report says pretty clearly Michael wasn't even underweight. So was it more stress? was it more insomnia? *shrugs*

Also all the symptoms Michael allegedly (he can't tell himself anymore) showed can be caused by very different problems aside from insomnia, like for example some ppl suffer sideeffects from benzodiazepine treatment (which were found by the police in Michaels home and/or Murray said which were included in his 'treatment'... well again he is a proven liar so I'd even take that with a grain of salt always), others do suffer that from the withdrawl of such... but there can also be some stress symptoms be underlying again.
Ppl respond so differently to so many imaginable different factors... it's really lame and lazy even if the highest payed specialist now does this! (btw specialist or not to me it's unprofessional to speculate about it now... even if influencing a jury is important in this system... it has nothing to do with reality... real would be to say, noone can tell now anymore!!!)

There was no doctor/specialist diagnosing properly while Michael was still alive. Isn't that the point?!
Is AEG in any way responsible for having an completely incompetent doctor in front of their eyes dealing with the health problems of Michael (whatever their nature migh was they surely weren't for a cardiologist?!), isn't that the point?!

How this trial is led by the judge, what's going on there yet... it's ridiculous to me... can someone please make all of them focus please... maybe they are all suffering insomnia, stress and are under the influence of something???!!!
 
It is interesting that when an expert attempts to tie some of the symptoms Michael exhibited to sleep deprivation, it is considered questionable and skeptical while the attempts to tie those same symptoms simply to substance abuse seems to be more readily acceptable.

Gerryevans, Gongaware and Phillips in particular understand that if they express any awareness or admit to any discussion regarding the doctor helping Michael with his sleep issues without verifying that he was capable of helping Michael with those issues, they could be held liable.

ivy;3852466 said:
Given that the lawsuit is against AEG, what independent contractors such as Ortega and Payne etc. knew is irrelevant. Did AEG execs knew or not, that's the question.

I wonder if the defense knew that the testimonies of their witnesses who are independent contractors could be considered irrelevant? Perhaps the defense discovered this when those independent contractors who testified thus far did not help their case? Calling Ortega may prove to be fatal to the defense.

We may never know if Gongaware or Phillips knew of Michael’s sleep issues AND that the doctor was there to help with those issues because they have conveniently forgotten any and all conversations with and without the doctor regarding Michael’s sleep issues. Honestly, their persistent forgetfulness says much more than if they had testified to the actual meeting(s) and/or Phillips' phone conversation(s). Witnesses who try to withhold information seemingly on purpose are usually not seen as trustworthy.
 
Last edited:
Tygger;3852530 said:
I wonder if the defense knew that the testimonies of their witnesses who are independent contractors could be considered irrelevant?

I didn't say that, did I? They testify to a lot of stuff which is a lot more than sleep issue. It's just that as AEG is the defendant, it's all about what they knew or should have known. Let's say Ortega might have been aware of Michael having insomnia but unless he told it to Phillips / Gongaware / other execs, you have nothing to prove that AEG knew or should have known.

It is interesting that when an expert attempts to tie some of the symptoms Michael exhibited to sleep deprivation, it is considered questionable and skeptical while the attempts to tie those same symptoms simply to substance abuse seems to be more readily acceptable.

I think the issue is the experts attempt to make a certain determination (power of $950 an hour) when actually no one can say for sure what those were.

Let me remind some fair answers

Dr. Steve Shafer: Scientists are reluctant to state that something is a certain fact

MJJC: What do you think about June 19th (Kenny Ortega's email describing Michael- chills, seeming lost), and June 21st (hot and cold symptoms described by Cherylin Lee). What could those symptoms come from?

Dr. Steve Shafer: It is hard to know. The defense proposed that those might be withdrawal from Demerol, and that is correct. It might also be withdrawal from lorazepam. Propofol withdrawal hasn’t been described, because nobody other than Michael Jackson has ever received propofol night after night for insomnia. However, at least in theory it could be propofol withdrawal.

However, it could also be the usual sort of illness: the “stomach flu” or a bad cold. There is no way of knowing.
 
Ivy, where did I say you said that? I asked a question.

You are correct that it cannot be proven unless someone who has a better memory of those meetings and phone calls that Gongaware and Phillips conveniently forgot testifies to what they may still remember.



Ivy, I see you have added to your post. Where and when did this sleep expert say he was speaking beyond his opinion of the data he reviewed? He is an esteemed professional who never said his opinion was fact. If he is a quack, someone should alert his previous employers like NASA, the U.S. government, the CIA, etc, and his current employer, the Boston Red Sox because they might be paying him much more than he received to testify.
 
Last edited:
It is interesting that when an expert attempts to tie some of the symptoms Michael exhibited to sleep deprivation, it is considered questionable and skeptical while the attempts to tie those same symptoms simply to substance abuse seems to be more readily acceptable.

That's because it is more common to a layman that such behavior is a result of substance abuse than sleep deprivation. If you see someone extremely out of it, you're not thinking they're sleep deprived. Most of us don't have any experience with insomnia causing that kind of extreme behavior to know that is the problem. And after two months of Murray's treatment, it does seem it was the substances affecting MJ as much as any insomnia.

Gerryevans, Gongaware and Phillips in particular understand that if they express any awareness or admit to any discussion regarding the doctor helping Michael with his sleep issues without verifying that he was capable of helping Michael with those issues, they could be held liable.

This is why I don't believe in this suit. It should not be the promoters' responsibility to secure a capable doctor for the performer. Someone mentioned a scenario of cancer. I don't believe if an artist has cancer, it's the promoter who should seek out the cancer physician, even if they are advancing the artist the money for the doctor. That's a very very personal decision, that should be the artist's.
 
I don't think they knew about sleep issues. they may have suspected something was wrong but they did not know it was due to lack of sleep. so the jacksons still have work to do.
They have established that MJ had problems but they have not established that AEG knew about his sleep problems.

Read Phillips testimony, they talked about it with Murray.

a nutritionist to fix sleep issues? That's so funny.come on... and the fact that PG suggested a nutritionist means nothing really in the big picture except that he may have felt MJ was not eating well. not that he was not sleeping at all.

Also at this point AEG did not know that MJ had insomnia. This was not known to anybody else besides MJ and CM. Both were very secretive about MJ medical conditions.

Please, give me a break and try to be respectful. What is funny is your post, I never said that, you completeley misunderstood what I wrote and then you make fun of me ? Great.


I was pretty sure CM order propofol before the end of April, you posted April 30. I will have to check later.
I did not say that, I looked it up and said april 6 and 28 for propofol, april 30 for benzos.


Re your comment to Ivy about fueling the fire--she just told me thank you for my post. It is ridiculous IMO to accuse someone of fueling the fire when they simply say thank you. I think people have asked Ivy a lot of questions, which is fine, but she has patiently answered them, and yet periodically she gets accused of stuff that as someone just reading what she wrote, I don't see how she has done anything to deserve those accusations, such as your accusation that she is fueling the fire by saying thank you to someone's post. This is putting her in a bind. That IMO is unfair and something I don't like to see happen to anyone who is doing their best to help us with facts (as opposed to opinions). We need facts on which to form/base our opinions. I have read a few comments criticizing her and have not said anything, but I finally will say--let's give her the respect and appreciation she deserves! I was very glad to read your acknowledgement of the hard work she does for us all!! Yay!!

I'll say what I want to say, and I'll repeat this : it's hard to be against the "mainstram opinion" here. It's also very tiring to read this kind of posts or aguments with personnal attacks and disrespect, mostly directed to always the same persons, and the "bad atmosphere" it creates here. There was no need to enter into an argument about what that dr said and take it so personnally just because one person doesn't agree with you, and no need for the "sigh" comment, no need to say that some questions are "tiring" , or no need to say that certain posters have a lot of "imagination" , or are "funny" etc.. and so no need to start it again, IMO.
It IS tiring, I'm personnally not far fom leaving this forum altogether. I'm not a very confrontational person, and I'm sometimes a bit disappointed or tired of having to answer to or read personnal attacks.


this part I disagree. first of all dietitian does require a specific set of knowledge which I'm not sure a doctor would have. Second I have seen people going through cancer treatments with little to no appetite and eating is a torture for such people. if you force them to eat it just makes it worse. so trying to feed them is actually very difficult and does require planning by an expert nutritionist. (ps : seeing that cancer patients being referred to dietitian, I will assume that it's not something a doctor would be the best person to do)



I'm going to comment on this explaining US medical system. Here there are two distinct doctors : general physicians (Also known as family doctors) and specialists. In USA the general physicians are the first one to go and they can handle very basic general care issues such as routine checkups, immunizations and so on. For everything else they refer to you to a specialist.

so given US medical system, it's not really weird to consider an actual specialist for a very specific issue.

Doctors know about nutrition , PG himself could not explain that. They were not looking for doctors specialised in nutrition , Phillips hired a friend of his, who is not a "nutritionnist" at all.
What you say is true for physical therapists, because that's an entirely different training , not nutritionists, a doctor could have done that. Apparently CM said he would, and never did. he was apparently expected to do that. According to Kai Chase, he didn't do much, if anything at all, about nutrition, and we heard about the result.

Re bolded : I didn't think about forcing people (which is what Phillip's friend was supposd to do I guess, in a way) , I was thinking of those enriched drinks they give to people who can't eat enough. My spefather was presribed stuff like that when he was going through several rounds of chemotherapy, and I was buying them, from a pharmacy. It was 15 years ago, so I guess they can do better things now, more efficient. What I was buying looked like flavored milk, and was enriched with all sorts of stuff (protein/vitamins, etc...) so he could be 'fed" without having to go through a full meal. In my stepfather's case , he was prescribed about 25cl per "meal" (about an average glass). I also saw these products when I was working in a hospital. Michael had a low appetite, he was not going through what cancer patients go through. You can also give nutritionnal stuff IV, like Nurse Lee did, Murray did not even try it apparently.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for those who tried to explain to me why all the insomnia talk... however I stick with my frusteration and what I said before, to me that's all speculation.
What Ortega described in his emails, what Faye described in the stand, even the rapid weight loss in the months before his death... that can all be speculated about only.

I personally do not even see nutrition really a center of any problem Michael might suffer at all? My brain works the way that it keeps in mind what is proven: The coroners report says pretty clearly Michael wasn't even underweight. So was it more stress? was it more insomnia? *shrugs*

Also all the symptoms Michael allegedly (he can't tell himself anymore) showed can be caused by very different problems aside from insomnia, like for example some ppl suffer sideeffects from benzodiazepine treatment (which were found by the police in Michaels home and/or Murray said which were included in his 'treatment'... well again he is a proven liar so I'd even take that with a grain of salt always), others do suffer that from the withdrawl of such... but there can also be some stress symptoms be underlying again.
Ppl respond so differently to so many imaginable different factors... it's really lame and lazy even if the highest payed specialist now does this! (btw specialist or not to me it's unprofessional to speculate about it now... even if influencing a jury is important in this system... it has nothing to do with reality... real would be to say, noone can tell now anymore!!!)

There was no doctor/specialist diagnosing properly while Michael was still alive. Isn't that the point?!
Is AEG in any way responsible for having an completely incompetent doctor in front of their eyes dealing with the health problems of Michael (whatever their nature migh was they surely weren't for a cardiologist?!), isn't that the point?!

How this trial is led by the judge, what's going on there yet... it's ridiculous to me... can someone please make all of them focus please... maybe they are all suffering insomnia, stress and are under the influence of something???!!!

re bolded : LOL !! :)

the point in nutrition and all this talk, is to show Murray's incompetence.
For the rest, I agree with you...

Careful. When I said at the least AEG employees/independent contractors knew about Michael's sleep issues much earlier based on testimonies before Phillips, it caused quite a bit of grief.

Thanks. Helmet & bullet proof jacket on (thank god it's not too hot here)

Given that the lawsuit is against AEG, what independent contractors such as Ortega and Payne etc. knew is irrelevant. Did AEG execs knew or not, that's the question.
It will be /is if they have told AEG / talked about it in front of them.

It is interesting that when an expert attempts to tie some of the symptoms Michael exhibited to sleep deprivation, it is considered questionable and skeptical while the attempts to tie those same symptoms simply to substance abuse seems to be more readily acceptable.
Though I think dr Czeisler's testimony is questionable in some parts, and way too long and detailed.
I agree with you about the lack of reaction to what Dr Earley said (Michael definitely addicted to demerol and "no proof from reading the records" that Michael was addicted to benzos and/or propofol).
Only 2 posters reacted to that, and then after realising he is an AEG expert, deafening silence. I find that a bit incredible, what he said is far worse and way more inaccurate than what Czeisler said.

This is why I don't believe in this suit. It should not be the promoters' responsibility to secure a capable doctor for the performer. Someone mentioned a scenario of cancer. I don't believe if an artist has cancer, it's the promoter who should seek out the cancer physician, even if they are advancing the artist the money for the doctor. That's a very very personal decision, that should be the artist's.

I completely agree with you. The problem I see is that it is AEG who inserted themselves in this.

Conrad Murray was concerned with Michael Jackson's diet in early June of 2009, which is why AEG Live held a meeting to address Michael Jackson's overall health and weight. Michael Jackson did have a proper diet and Conrad Murray was preparing very high nutrient protein shakes!

Thank you for finding this. We know from Kai Chase that Murray did not do that, and we know from Phillips and Gongaware's testimonies that after the 2nd and 3rd meeting, PG then Phillips started to look for a nutritionnist / food person. Very strange IMO.
 
Last edited:
Bouee,

quote_icon.png
Originally Posted by Tygger
Careful. When I said at the least AEG employees/independent contractors knew about Michael's sleep issues much earlier based on testimonies before Phillips, it caused quite a bit of grief.




Thanks. Helmet & bullet proof jacket on (thank god it's not too hot here)

I must admit I have seen some (only a few) comments on here that I think are a little cringe worthy, however I do feel that sarcasm doesn't help. I enjoy our discussions and never think less of you because we don't always agree.
 
Bouee,

I must admit I have seen some (only a few) comments on here that I think are a little cringe worthy, however I do feel that sarcasm doesn't help. I enjoy our discussions and never think less of you because we don't always agree.
 
I know, and until we hear otherwise, I'll consider it was not an intentional mistake, except for Phillips' attitude in the end. But not intentional doesn't mean "not liable" to me. At least if AEG is found liable, it will be a precedent, so that others or AEG don't do it again.



I don't know if they could/should have guessed it was from insomnia. Lack of sleep was at the back of my head too about those symptoms, but though I'm not a professional, I had sleep issues myself, so maybe that's why I thought about it.
But they should have wondered about the doctor's competence, I think it's another argument in favor of negligent hiring.

I think that regardless of the outcome of this trial a precedent will be set whether it is that no concert producers ever get involved in any way with the hiring of a doctor or at the very least the contracts would be worded differently, a better disclaimer for example.

I just feel from them looking at nutrition it is an indication that they didn't know, or at least they didn't know it could be the root cause of any issues Michael was having.

I struggle with this one because having some clue that Michael, whilst touring, had difficulty sleeping, there would be a part of me that (naively) would be happy that Michael had his own doctor to keep him safe, thinking back to Heath Ledger, he suffered with insomnia and ended up accidentally overdosing. Never, ever would it have entered my head that a doctor would give Michael general aesthetic and comatose him, I just never would have guessed it, not in a million years.
 
I understood that discussion as "are you sleeping enough? do you get rest enough?" type of discussion. I don't think they had the knowledge of "can't sleep more than 3 hours, no drugs work, need anesthesia".

I agree, I seriously doubt that Michael would have went into specifics with the AEG executives about what was REALLY going on with his sleep routine. In my opinion, he trusted Murray, and must have figured that he had the problem in check. I mean, isn't that what he basically told Nurse Lee, i.e. "it's fine, as long as you are being monitored."

In my opinion, at that time the big elephant in the room was that nut Arnold Klein. The OTHER issue, in my opinion, was Michael's eating habits. Which I believe is something that was a part of his life for a long time, tour or no tour. I remember back in the day, when he would say how sometimes he would forget to eat (Lord, forget to eat, LOL, when I'm eating breakfast, I'm already thinking about lunch) and his story about how Elizabeth Taylor would have to FEED HIM.

If AEG knew about that 3 hour sleeping issue, I'm sure they would have "SUGGESTED" a highly qualified sleep specialist. I say SUGGESTED, because you can make suggestions until you are blue in the face, if a person (and I'm not just talking about MJ) is not willing to take up your suggestion, then you are back to square one, because you can't force an adult to do anything they don't want to do, in my opinion.
 
What? :bugeyed Who is paying him? Michael's money? I am wondering how much money the estate waste if Katherine lose the case. I know Michael's name and his children emotional health are the total loss no matter the outcome of the trial.

The next accounting report will give us an idea.
 
In my opinion, at that time the big elephant in the room was that nut Arnold Klein. The OTHER issue, in my opinion, was Michael's eating habits. Which I believe is something that was a part of his life for a long time, tour or no tour. I remember back in the day, when he would say how sometimes he would forget to eat (Lord, forget to eat, LOL, when I'm eating breakfast, I'm already thinking about lunch) and his story about how Elizabeth Taylor would have to FEED HIM.

Re Klein : Phillips talked about the invoice with Kane, when you look at the invoice , it doesn't make sense. And when you look at the dates (without the invoice), it doesn't make sense IMO : Michael was at Klein's more often in april than may & june. Michael's health started to decline around the end of may, became obvious to everyone around june 19th.
---

I just rewatched KO's testimony at CM's trial :



- Murray doing Michael's schedule :
part 1 at about 35mn - part 2 longer questions at about 13 :50 - part 2- 28mn

Murray was doing Michael's schedule before june 20th. KO doesn't know who asked Murray to do the schedule, or if Murray offered to do it. He talked about it with Murray at the Forum (date unclear , the Forum was in june - I think Murray doing Michael's schedule was part of june 18th meeting). When KO and Murray talked at the forum, Murray said, according to KO, that Michael should be allowed to have lunch with his children.

Tough love & now or never part (part one's next question & part 2 at about 13:50 & 17:00) :

KO believes there was another meeting , where he was not present, where Michael was explained that if he didn't show up to rehearsals the show could not go on / they wouldn't be able to open as scheduled. (I think it was june 18th- intervention meeting)



June 20th :

part 1 : 40mn - part 2 : about 18mn

- KO tried to call Murray on june 19th

- KO says Murray was upset that KO sent Michael home &, that KO did not allow Michael to rehearse. Murray said Michael was physically and emotionally capable of handling all his responsabilities for the show. KO was shocked, because it was not what KO saw on june 19th. KO asked Michael to confirm that KO did not make the decision to send him home on his own, Michael confirmed & reassured Ortega. What Murray was saying to KO was not what occurred the night before, Murray turned to Michael for clarification.

- KO left right after that, stayed for 10mns, the other persons remained. (part 2 about 20mn)

- KO said he was the first to leave (which directly contradicts Phillips when he said that everyone left together & that he did not talk to Murray after the meeting, still at CM trial)
 
Last edited:
I completely agree with you. The problem I see is that it is AEG who inserted themselves in this.

And you know on an moral level i agree with you as well, however, in practice if AEG were sorting contracts out for Michael, if that was their job, whether it's a chef, nanny, doctor etc., then maybe they didn't interject themselves, and certainly the wording on the draft would indicate that they were putting it together but at an arms length.

In this instance I feel the context is everything.

While I wholeheartedly agree that normally it is weird for a promoter / producer to insert themselves into hiring a personal physician (or anyone that's a personal employee), I think there are some different situation here. and it's all about the stage of Michael's business affairs. We all know that he had a few staff - Bain who was fired, Lopez who was fired Feb 09 and Tohme and his lawyer Hawk. We also know that not all of these people were good or knowledgeable about the stuff they do - Tohme having no knowledge and Michael's taxes not being paid for 3 years (2006-2008), Estate claiming Neverland deal being unfavorable to Michael and so on.

So normally Michael would produce his own tour (as Payne testified working for MJJProductions before) but this time Michael did not have the knowledgeable manpower to do it himself. Also his people were changing Lopez was out by February, Dileo came in smetime March - May, Tohme was fired in April - May but was back in June in some capacity, Leonard Rowe was hired and then fired, Branca and Katz were coming in as lawyers in June and May and there was also a business managers. So you can see all these changes were happening right during the tour prep and again Michael did not have a team in place to handle all these hiring stuff.

So AEG said "okay we'll help you with it, we will do it, we will be producers". I think that's why they "inserted" themselves nt only hiring the doctor but hiring personal make yo artist Karen Faye and Payne (who used to be hired by Michael himself). Even Kai Chase - a personal chef - said that she was working for Michael and paid by AEG.

Hindsight is now showing us it was far better for AEG to stay the hell away from hiring any personal employee and especially a doctor but honestly I don't think they saw the consequences back in the day. I'm pretty sure they wanted Michael to perform - not die, they did not think Murray would kill Michael as Murray's best interest was also Michael alive & touring to get his monthly salary. From legal perspective they probably thought the wording on the contract protected them.
 
Let's see - today is June 24th.

Mr. Panish said that he would be wrapping up his case on Monday, July 8th. That gives him TEN DAYS to tie everything together. (Thursday, July 4th is Independence Day, a national holiday in America. Courts will be dark on that day.)

Where I'm sitting, he needs to spend that time, TYING EVERYTHING TOGETHER. In my opinion, everything is sort of scattered right now. He still has a lot of witness on his witness list, he definitely will not be able to get them all on, and if he puts up any more expert witnesses, they eat up the majority of his remaining presentation.

Although Michael's siblings are on Mr. Panish's witness list, I bet he NEVER planned to use them. LOL!

What to do, what to do! Times a wasting!
 
^^^^ I agree, the only part I am unsure about is whether they offered or Michael asked, we know he asked for Murray and I would assume he asked for Kai Chase as well.

If AEG had 'hired' a doctor, chef etc who was unknown to Michael then I would be more inclined to say they inserted themselves and dictated to Michael.
 
inserted for me is :

1-offering the wrong contract to Murray (instead of a chash advance) = they hired him on Michael's behalf
2-getting way too much involved with Murray (Kai Chase was never involved in meetings, never asked to go to rehearsals for example)
3-Ignoring the signs that Murray was not doing a good job, to say the least. As they were in the process of hiring him, they could have done something about it. Or, they agreed to hire an incompetent doctor.
 
Thanks for the reminders Bouee.

- KO says Murray was upset that KO sent Michael home &, that KO did not allow Michael to rehearse. Murray said Michael was physically and emotionally capable of handling all his responsabilities for the show. KO was shocked, because it was not what KO saw on june 19th. KO asked Michael to confirm that KO did not make the decision to send him home on his own, Michael confirmed & reassured Ortega. What Murray was saying to KO was not what occurred the night before, Murray turned to Michael for clarification.

No wonder Murray was annoyed, clearly he didn't like to be told by Kenny!

Do we have a list of dates of all the rehearsals Michael attended?
 
inserted for me is :

1-offering the wrong contract to Murray (instead of a chash advance) = they hired him on Michael's behalf
2-getting way too much involved with Murray (Kai Chase was never involved in meetings, never asked to go to rehearsals for example)
3-Ignoring the signs that Murray was not doing a good job, to say the least. As they were in the process of hiring him, they could have done something about it. Or, they agreed to hire an incompetent doctor.

Ah, I thought you meant they were forcing things/people on Michael.

I don't know to be honest, on one hand I see what you mean but on the other hand there were indications that all was not well so, yes, they did need to talk with the doctor, and he was supposed to be on hand whilst Michael was performing and he stated he was already treating Michael so really he should be at rehearsals.
 
inserted for me is :

1-offering the wrong contract to Murray (instead of a chash advance) = they hired him on Michael's behalf
2-getting way too much involved with Murray (Kai Chase was never involved in meetings, never asked to go to rehearsals for example)
3-Ignoring the signs that Murray was not doing a good job, to say the least. As they were in the process of hiring him, they could have done something about it. Or, they agreed to hire an incompetent doctor.

2-Maybe it's just me, but comparing a doctor (Murray) to the household HELP (Kia Chase) is a stretch, to say the least.

3-Two things, in my opinion, AEG didn't have an opportunity to "have done something," because of timing. I mean, June 19th, June 20th - were there meetings on those 2 days? In my opinion, between let's say June 19th and when Michael actually died, was a very short period of time to SUGGEST something to the Artist, especially when the Artist said "I'm fine."

Had there been more time, MAYBE somebody would have been able to figure out that Murray was doing something he wasn't supposed to be doing. But even that is a big IF, because who would have been brave enough to tell the executives at AEG, that something WRONG was going on in Michael's bedroom at night. We know that Kai Chase said she was concerned, but she didn't do anything about it. In all seriousness, what could she have done? If she couldn't even ask MJ about a missed paycheck, she certainly wouldn't have approached him about his personal doctor. I don't think she would have gone to AEG, maybe she could have said something to Michael Amir, but for all we know, Mr. Amir may have had the same concerns, but did nothing about it either.
 
Didn't AEG pay some advance money to MJ? I've been wondering why did Michael Amir Williams call Gongaware asking him to offer 150K to Murray? Did MJ directed his assistant to call Gongaware to deal with that stuff? Why didn't MJ made the offer himself or directed MAW to his own lawyer? Or did MAW just himself decided to call PG for that not knowing what to do?

AEG's lawyers should have directed Murray to MJ and his lawyers. It seems the situation was a huge mess with all those people being hired and fired all over the place and MJ not having a stable team.
 
I've been wondering why did Michael Amir Williams call Gongaware asking him to offer 150K to Murray? Did MJ directed his assistant to call Gongaware to deal with that stuff? Why didn't MJ made the offer himself or directed MAW to his own lawyer? Or did MAW just himself decided to call PG for that not knowing what to do?

If I recall correctly, Michael was in the car with Mr. Williams, and Michael screamed out: " Offer him $150,000.00." And Michael Amir Williams just appeared to have repeated what MJ said, and/or the person on the other end of the phone heard MJ directly.

I "think" that's the way the story goes. Maybe somebody can confirm my recollection.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top