Latest on MJJC

New Katherine Jackson Interview (about Michael's children, tribute concert, Michael of course, etc.)

MsCassieMollie;3489910 said:
Her whispers turn into tears. ‘People tell me all the time that I’m strong, but I don’t think so. Paris, Prince and Blanket suffer in different ways. Prince tried to be stronger than the others. He wants to be a man. He doesn’t want people to see what’s inside.

‘During the funeral when the children were given the crown to put on top of the casket, he put his hand on my shoulder and started to cry. He wanted to be strong because he was around all his cousins. From the moment they came from the hospital [after Michael died], they were all bawling their eyes out.’
Click to expand...


And LaToya said the kids havnt been crying since the minute they left the hospital on June 25th.. smh
 
Ramona122003 said:
The witnesses believe in the sleeping soul. When ones dies you soul falls asleep and won't awaken again until judgment day as one of the chosen ones. So, Katherine does believe that Michael's asleep and is aware of nothing.
Click to expand...

Witnesses do not believe people have a soul. Also the idea about judgement day and chosen ones is not exactly right as you explain it. (I just wanted tyo put that out there.) However, with that being said, I agree with you that Katherine's views on what happens when a person dies, does not excuse what she has done since MJ died.
 
I agree that she's hurting... I just wish she would choose more carefully what papers to talk to and what things to reveal to them...
 
JMie said:
I agree that she's hurting... I just wish she would choose more carefully what papers to talk to and what things to reveal to them...
Click to expand...

Yeah, way to win sympathetic. 'I'm broke, I only make 9 million a year' the horror!

I swear, does Mrs. Jackson has any idea how silly and selfish she sounds?
 
JMie said:
I agree that she's hurting... I just wish she would choose more carefully what papers to talk to and what things to reveal to them...
Click to expand...

Yeah, way to win sympathetic. 'I'm broke, I only make 9 million a year' the horror!
 
I don't know whether is the writer put her interview in this way or what. After reading this, I really didn't feel quite good about the whole thing. She claimed the estate is being unfair?! What's that suppose to mean? Does this imply that MJ suppose to gave all the money to all his family? (Honestly, MJ had done enough to this family. Stop using him in death.) I feel like she is questioning MJ's decision. and the whole tribute concert thing just sounds way off. As for the Hayvenhurst, I can see her point of view and I also think it would be nice if the estate can keep that house if possible. However, on the other hand, why MJ is the only who need to be responsible for this? If she really wants to keep the house, why doesn't she gather the money from the whole family members to keep the house? If they don't have that money, I believe Janet has. Why MJ had to pay all those things for everyone when he is still in debt? I really want to say Katherine is the one being unfair not only to MJ but also to PPB. The claim that MJ gave the house to her as a gift is interesting. I believe MJ loved her and will try to please his mother. But the reality is the house is not giving to her in law. She is not the owner. If this is the family house, why MJ is the one paying all these things for almost 30 years? He is rich and generous but it doesn't mean this is his obligation to do so. The estate sure doesn't have the obligation to look after all the other Jacksons.
Again the media wants to say it's weird how MJ raise his kids and what they are now are "normal". Jesus! I am so sick of this comment now and it seemed that the J family also kind of agree with that. All those they are having normal life now etc just made me want to scream. MJ tried so hard to keep his kids out of the public eyes and now they just discredit everything he did? I feel so sad for MJ that even his own family don't understand him.

and can they stop talking about the kids life? Just like other people said in previous post, we don't need a progress report. Why they keep invading those kids' privacy? MJ is the celebrity not his kids. I never saw them talking about the life of Jermaine's kids etc. SIGH~~~
 
Last edited:
This won't be a random interview. It clearly wasn't done to promote a positive picture before murray's trial as only vague conspiracy talk is mentioned. It was given to a big circulation uk tabloid and will be done to promote the cardiff tribute, the details are at the bottom of the article. Maybe it was in KJ's terms and conditions. The reason there is so much about
Mrs J's feelings of anguish at losing Michael and the details about the chidren is because Mrs J obviously feels this is a price worth paying for getting the interview in the paper. I agree entirely with petrarose that the intimate details of the childrens' grieving should have remained private, but it was Mrs J's decision to divulge them and it is the type of prurient detail tabloids love. The reporter would not have travelled out to LA just to hear about the exciting preparations for the cardiff concert.

Unfortunately it's just part of a pattern, if Mrs J has a project to sell or a gripe against the estate she gets an interview in the media and inevitably will have to talk about her loss of Michael as that is the only thing the media are interested in and she will either talk about the children or actually include the children along with her, eg oprah and the heal the world interview on gma. I'm truely devastated for her loss, to lose a child must break your heart, but the financial motivations behind all these media interviews is cheapening that loss, esp when its done with a horrible tabloid who makes such disrespectful comments in their article.
 
MissRed07, I feel the same way.

She is openly questioning MJ's wishes. Obviously, if she feels the estate is "unfair", she should take it to the judge & probate court.

But she knows, her "unfair" statement will not be corroborated, when the executors present all the spendings & EVERYTHING the estate has done for her since MJ's passing.

That is why she'd rather invite a rag into her home to vent than take the legal route.

I commend the estate for standing their ground....Michael's wishes FIRST & FOREMOST, must respect.
 
Katherine lives in a 10 million dollar home and all of her and the kids expenses are paid plus they are given thousands of $ for monthly allowance. How is this unfair?!!!! Plus wasn't it a judge who decided what Katherine's allowance was?

Maybe I am too sensative about this but when she says the Estate is unfair it feels like she is saying MJ is unfair because isn't the MJ Estate following what Michael wanted as it is written in the trust?

I have never doubted Katherine's love for Michael but I think there were and are expectations put on Michael that aren't put on any of the others.
 
ilmjj said:
Maybe I am too sensative about this but when she says the Estate is unfair it feels like she is saying MJ is unfair because isn't the MJ Estate following what Michael wanted as it is written in the trust?
Click to expand...

I sometimes think that lot of people feel this way. That's why the Estate executives is practically immune from criticism.
 
If the Estate execs don't follow the trust isn't that grounds for removal? I guess I am not sure what more Katherine wants them to do...
 
ilmjj said:
If the Estate execs don't follow the trust isn't that grounds for removal? I guess I am not sure what more Katherine wants them to do...
Click to expand...

They follow the trust rules. The do have discretion as to how to follow the trust. For example, the decision to sell Encino house. They don't HAVE to sell, they HAVE THE RIGHT to sell it. It is their decision and deem this house not worthy of protection as part of Michael's legacy. Some of their decisions I personally like less than others.
Anyway, I think we are going off-topic. But I simply don't understand how one can equal Executors with Michael. Granted, they are doing great job so far. Mostly.

By the way, I would like to know how much of the 9 million "for Katherine and kids" was Hayvenhurst mortgage. I simply don't remember.
 
^^^ $4m for mortgage, $5m for expenses since june 09 (estate statement to a us tv prog where latoya had said noone had seen a penny from MJ's estate).
 
MyGirl said:
I think she did not refer to money when he spoke about being unfair. He talked about all the actions. The sale of the house, the concert.
Click to expand...

It goes way deeper than that. Basically KJ wants the Estate to support all her children and grandchildren. In short the entire clan. MJ's Estate was NOT designed for that. It's as simple as that.

And that explains why she's pimping the MJ3 and running all kinds of deals. It's an attempt to raise money so she could pass on to others.
 
passy001 said:
It goes way deeper than that. Basically KJ wants the Estate to support all her children and grandchildren. In short the entire clan. MJ's Estate was NOT designed for that. It's as simple as that.

And that explains why she's pimping the MJ3 and running all kinds of deals. It's an attempt to raise money so she could pass on to others.
Click to expand...

That's exactly what it is. When Latoya says the family gets no money it's really her and the others. Katherine and the kids are well taken care of. Nobody will believe otherwise. You can't feel sorry for Katherine when all her expenses are taken care of and she lives in a mutli-million dollar home when people have to work 2 or 3 jobs to get by now a days. Michael took care of them all and now they have to fend for themselves as he wanted them to based on his will.
 
Neither Michael nor is his Estate is the BOA. But it's always nice to see Michael Jackson's mother give an interview to the same rags that nearly destroyed Michael. But I see that nothing's off limits, everything can be done for the right price.
 
Katherine has so much money and have enough money to have a life of luxury. -_- What does she want more? :blink: Much complaint/drama because of money. Why???? :wtf: She should be very happy with what she has! :doh: Much love for the money is not a good thing. :nono: :fear:





xrisx said:
I still don't understand why the family is so against the estate.
Click to expand...

Well, they (brothers...) are not in the Will. :fear:
 
enlightenu said:
No. That is not what she means. Her views are based on the scripture at Ecclesiastes 9:5 which states "the dead are conscience of NOTHING at all." She also believe in the resurrection hope which is also in the scriptures which promises there will be a time when "all those in memorial tombs will come out" (John 5:28). What she's saying is she looking forward to seeing her son again.
Click to expand...

You beat me to the punch with those Scriptures, Enlightenu! Katherine meant no disrespect by saying that, it is her faith. She's still a Jehovah's Witness and they, along with other Christian sects, believe that the spirit of the dead are at rest. I am a Christian too and those Scriptures teach us that physical death isn't the end and we believers will see our loved ones again.
 
What is sad is that fans make campaigns to have media stop using disparaging names for Michael like "J," and then his mom goes the same paper that refuses to stop using that "J" word. This means that ever time we take one step forward to help Michael's legacy, some people do actions that pushes us 2 steps backwards!!! It is becoming very frustrating indeed.
 
I hoped that once the Estate issued cash to the Michael Jackson Trust these money schemes would stop. The Executors have to present valid documentation to the court about how the Estate is being handled. The Court has not complained or objected to anything that has been done. The Jacksons feel they should be part of the decision making in regards to how Michael's legacy should be used, but I think almost everything they have done has been in poor taste and quality.
 
MsCassieMollie;3489910 said:
‘He was a very good son. People tried to poison the world against him. All this molestation stuff was just a lie. [/B]

‘Oprah Winfrey says if a child tells you something, believe it. It’s just the opposite! That first boy came out and admitted he lied because his father made him and the father wanted the money.’
Click to expand...

Now why would you want to invite someone like Oprah to your home when you know her stand in this?

...and why would you liked to wish she had contacted you (called/condolense letter) when your son passed away when you KNOW her stand? (remember Oprah said Katherine were a bit upset with Oprah that she hadnt reached out to her when MJ passed)

I just dont get it. Why even bother with a person like Oprah
 
Vici said:
Now why would you want to invite someone like Oprah to your home when you know her stand in this?

...and why would you liked to wish she had contacted you (called/condolense letter) when your son passed away when you KNOW her stand? (remember Oprah said Katherine were a bit upset with Oprah that she hadnt reached out to her when MJ passed)

I just dont get it. Why even bother with a person like Oprah
Click to expand...

Exactly,, If Katherine knew her position why would she even invite her into MJ's home and why would she even allow Oprah to talk to MJ's kids like she cared about them? It makes absolutely no sense to me at all
 
quote_icon.png
Originally Posted by Vici
Now why would you want to invite someone like Oprah to your home when you know her stand in this?

...and why would you liked to wish she had contacted you (called/condolense letter) when your son passed away when you KNOW her stand? (remember Oprah said Katherine were a bit upset with Oprah that she hadnt reached out to her when MJ passed)

I just dont get it. Why even bother with a person like Oprah
Click to expand...
jaydom7 said:
Exactly,, If Katherine knew her position why would she even invite her into MJ's home and why would she even allow Oprah to talk to MJ's kids like she cared about them? It makes absolutely no sense to me at all
Click to expand...

It makes perfect sense to me, if you think about her last two years' actions. Oprah has millions of audiences, and that's what Katherine wanted for her book. Oprah did it for the rating, Katherine used her to sell the book. this current tabloid interview proved once again she didn't care who she talked to, as long as they help her promote her things. if it means give them the chance to call her son "****" humiliate him, so be it.
 
^^That's the thing. The reporters always put in their own editorial spin, so that is why you have to be careful who you talk to.
 
No intrest in reading such interviews.the childrens private biz should not be sold for a quick buck especially by katherine.as if the money she gets isnt enough already she keeps pimping the kids and to one of the scummiest newspapers of all.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top