Randy is going to be on CNN live shortly

:doh:


I'm starting to feel penalty Randy. He is doing everything to appear and draw the attention. He really will not accomplish anything. :sigh: Disappointing that CNN has lost his time with Randy.
 
above EVERYTHING Randy said...the part that bothered me....he said Michael was threatened....Now that REEALLY is a clue as to what was going on
 
-The family is forming a charity yet to be named and the family will of course perform again because it's in their blood.

I know the name, I know the name!!! :dancin:

The Jackson Family Fundation

no? ah... yes, that's just Joe's? :tease:

why do they speak so much about making so many charities NOW? :scratch:
 
I can't imagine what Randy and his family have been going through, so I try to cut him some slack. I don't know why but for some reason he seems, at least to me, to be taking his brothers death harder than the other brothers, perhaps because they were so close in age and seemed to remain relatively close in Michael's later years. Relatively. Meaning that as far as his interaction with his family went (minus his mother) there was limited interaction, yes, but there seemed to be more with Randy than there was with his other brothers.

That being said, it seems that Randy is the only one who has a problem with the will. Which confuses me because he hasnt really stated WHY. If the courts are okay with the names of Michael's children being misspelled then why does Randy care? If the courts thought something was wrong with that then they certainly would say something.. right? Someone correct me if Im wrong, I'm no legal eagle. So as far as I can tell the only reason Randy has issue with the will is because of the spelling of the kids names? Is there any OTHER reason he feels that way?

Re: Thome and some of the other things that Randy's been talking about, that there were other people involved in Michael's death, I DO agree with him, but not in the way that he seems to believe. I DO think that other people INDIRECTLY had a hand in Michael's slow death. I mean honestly we can go all the way back to 1992 and the Chandlers for that if you REALLY wanna go there. But in terms of the last 2 years, yes, Thome, AEG, his financial situation and people who were hanging around him that did NOT have his best interests at heart (I'm looking at YOU TOO Klein!)definitely contributed in an indirect way to his death. But at the end of it all, I don't think that anyone but Michael hired Murray to inject him with propofol because he was stressed and could not sleep. Thats it. Charging Murray with something other than involuntary manslaughter will surely get him off, which is not what ANY of us wants. T Mez himself said that the charges are accurate based on the evidence and I believe him. I mean he's freaking TMEZ FFS! I wouldn't be surprised if he had a tshirt with TMEZ emblazoned across his chest underneath his suit just like Superman cause damn it he IS Superman. Anything he says I'm going with. Besides I'd rather Murray go to prison for involuntary manslaughter than have them give him a charge of murder and he be acquitted.

I have special places in my heart for Randy and all of the brothers (especially Jackie... RWAR!!! :wub:) and I know that as badly as I feel, it must be so much worse for them. I just hope that in time they will be able to find some kind of peace from all that's been happening. I think it's great that fans will be able to enter FL and pay their respects to Michael. I just hope they can all do so peacefully and respectfully.
 
Interview's over
On the side note - why is Randy always so mysterious? He always starts saying something and then he says "I can't get into it that much" or something similar. That seems to be his catch phrase nowadays. Quit teasin' Randy!

That's simply one tactic to keep people interested in what you might have to say. A very annoying tactic I must add. I hate when people start talking about something and then goes "but I can't discuss about that any more". Why to start in a first place if you can't finish what you've started?

Randy says the family will come together and perform again! "Ofcourse!"

Yup yup, as convincing as was Michael's "soon" :lol:
 
The one thing the fake will theory never clears up is if this one is fake, WHERE is the real one?

Does Randy or anybody really believe that Michael did not do a will?

Or is it that MJ did one and it favors the family and it's been destroyed?
If there was one favoring the family, wouldn't someone in the family or their lawyer been given a copy?
 
As far as the Jackson Family Foundation goes, that's JOE's "foundation" that was recently formed to help with the construction of the Michael Jackson museum thingie in Gary. I have my own theories and speculations about that so called foundation AND the "event" at the Beverly Hilton hotel, but that's for another thread.
 
I can't imagine what Randy and his family have been going through, so I try to cut him some slack. I don't know why but for some reason he seems, at least to me, to be taking his brothers death harder than the other brothers, perhaps because they were so close in age and seemed to remain relatively close in Michael's later years. Relatively. Meaning that as far as his interaction with his family went (minus his mother) there was limited interaction, yes, but there seemed to be more with Randy than there was with his other brothers.

That being said, it seems that Randy is the only one who has a problem with the will. Which confuses me because he hasnt really stated WHY. If the courts are okay with the names of Michael's children being misspelled then why does Randy care? If the courts thought something was wrong with that then they certainly would say something.. right? Someone correct me if Im wrong, I'm no legal eagle. So as far as I can tell the only reason Randy has issue with the will is because of the spelling of the kids names? Is there any OTHER reason he feels that way?

Re: Thome and some of the other things that Randy's been talking about, that there were other people involved in Michael's death, I DO agree with him, but not in the way that he seems to believe. I DO think that other people INDIRECTLY had a hand in Michael's slow death. I mean honestly we can go all the way back to 1992 and the Chandlers for that if you REALLY wanna go there. But in terms of the last 2 years, yes, Thome, AEG, his financial situation and people who were hanging around him that did NOT have his best interests at heart (I'm looking at YOU TOO Klein!)definitely contributed in an indirect way to his death. But at the end of it all, I don't think that anyone but Michael hired Murray to inject him with propofol because he was stressed and could not sleep. Thats it. Charging Murray with something other than involuntary manslaughter will surely get him off, which is not what ANY of us wants. T Mez himself said that the charges are accurate based on the evidence and I believe him. I mean he's freaking TMEZ FFS! I wouldn't be surprised if he had a tshirt with TMEZ emblazoned across his chest underneath his suit just like Superman cause damn it he IS Superman. Anything he says I'm going with. Besides I'd rather Murray go to prison for involuntary manslaughter than have them give him a charge of murder and he be acquitted.

I have special places in my heart for Randy and all of the brothers (especially Jackie... RWAR!!! :wub:) and I know that as badly as I feel, it must be so much worse for them. I just hope that in time they will be able to find some kind of peace from all that's been happening. I think it's great that fans will be able to enter FL and pay their respects to Michael. I just hope they can all do so peacefully and respectfully.


There are other people who have problems with the will in the family & on this board, more than just misspellings - but you need to go to the conspiracy section.
 
Blanket is not a name. It's a nickname.
Unfortunately I don't have a copy of this document, but there are many other issues, including place, MJ's signature,et.

BUT :agree:

this is not the conspiracy thread, so I think I should not follow that path. See the conspiracy for other details, Meme. I got quite surprised to see their comments on the will.


What are you talkign about?

Blanket is listed as Prince Michael Jackson II

Paris is listed as Paris-Michael Katherine Jackson

but Prince is listed as Prince Michael Jackson...but legal name is Michael Joseph Jackson. ...but everyone and their mama think Prince is his real name.

Prince is only a nickname to him...but it is Blanket's real name. Oh Michael...confusion.

Just because Prince's nickname was added doesn't make the will fake.

I am sure if MJ had made a mistake and wrote Randy Jackson instead of Randall Steven Jackson...he wouldn't say the will is fake.
 
I am sure if MJ had made a mistake and wrote Randy Jackson instead of Randall Steven Jackson...he wouldn't say the will is fake.

LOL! You got me ROLLING.

EXECLLENT POINT and very, very true. (That was a good one Memefan, big ups to you!)
 
Now it's time to analyze the pieces of the puzzle we are being given today:

- Joe/Oxman against AEG (and the terrible statement of Michael being a drug addict again)
- Randy telling some of the reasons for them not trusting the will and people threatening Michael, and more people are involved

and June 14 is around the corner....

what do you think?
 
There are other people who have problems with the will in the family & on this board, more than just misspellings - but you need to go to the conspiracy section.


Yeah.. I know I've heard some of them... about him being in NY at the time the will was supposed to have been signed, things like that. I just feel like if Randy feels the will is fake then he should either come up with concrete evidence that it IS fake, or leave well enough alone. It's clear that the will provides specifically for his children and his mother and the trust lays out how that money is distributed. THE END. If that were me, honestly I'd feel that as long as Michael's most precious things, his mom and his kids, are provided for I'd leave well enough alone. YMMV.

I don't wanna hijack the thread with this, cause that's not what we're supposed to be discussing here... I know the MJJC rules. :/
 
Just because Prince's nickname was added doesn't make the will fake.

I am sure if MJ had made a mistake and wrote Randy Jackson instead of Randall Steven Jackson...he wouldn't say the will is fake.

Meme... don't be that sweet, please. No need for that. This is not the thread to discuss that, there is a special thread for that issue and there are certainly more issues being discussed about this. And it has little to do with the Jacksons being or not being mentioned in the document.
 
Now it's time to analyze the pieces of the puzzle we are being given today:

- Joe/Oxman against AEG (and the terrible statement of Michael being a drug addict again)
- Randy telling some of the reasons for them not trusting the will and people threatening Michael, and more people are involved

and June 14 is around the corner....

what do you think?

I think Joe is an ass and Michael was murdered. as far as June 14th..I think it will be postponed to another day in sept.
 
and more people are involved

In my opinion, IF "more people are involved," WHO the heck are they?

Time to name names or shut your trap until you can say exactly who you are talking about. The talk of "OTHERS" has been going on for dang near a year and thus far has yielded no type of investigation, as far as I can see.

Who are the others?

What are they doing about the others?

Are the proper authorities investigation the others?

Why can't Randy or LaToya say exactly who the others are?

Their collective ramblings about "others" means nothing, in my opinion, WITHOUT further information, it's just senseless ramblings!
 
Originally Posted by Big Apple2
So does that mean Michael did not want to leave anything to his 3 children. LOL! If that's the best he can come up with, I'm very sorry, but that's just laughable.

I could see if Michael left a chunk of his estate to a total stranger, or GAVE the Sony/ATV catalog back to Sir Paul (as was rumored before Michael passed away). Now that is something that would definitely cause me to raise an eyebrow.

But to leave his estate in trust to his mother, 3 children and charity, seems exactly like something Michael would do. ESPECIALLY the part of the trust that determines at what age his children would obtain more of their trust. Very detailed and sounds totally like something Michael would do, to me!

In my opinion, it's standard procedure when folks are left out of a rich relatives' will, those left out "most" of the time question the authenticity. LOL!
Well said. Thank you. :agree:

Besides from helping Katherine with parenting duties for Michael's children and rightful heirs: Prince, Paris, and Blanket, I think it would be appropriate for Michael's siblings to help their mother, Katherine, carry out Michael Jackson's wishes and, thus, create the children's charities specified in Michael's Will and Trust.
That should keep them all very busy. :yes:
Oh by the way, I do believe Michael Jackson was murdered;
but Michael's Will and Trust are legitimate.
 
In my opinion, IF "more people are involved," WHO the heck are they?

Time to name names or shut your trap until you can say exactly who you are talking about. The talk of "OTHERS" has been going on for dang near a year and thus far has yielded no type of investigation, as far as I can see.

Why can't Randy or LaToya say exactly who the others are?

Because without proof, it's defamation/libel.
 
randy is such an attention seaker hes desperate to turn june 25th in a media circus. pathetic fool. doesnt give a dam about mjs kids just getting his mug on the T.v


and everyone else has already shot down his stupid claims re the will etc. so not evn gonna bother adding anything.
 
In my opinion, IF "more people are involved," WHO the heck are they?

Time to name names or shut your trap until you can say exactly who you are talking about. The talk of "OTHERS" has been going on for dang near a year and thus far has yielded no type of investigation, as far as I can see.

I agree. As far as their talking being bait for defamation, then they need to take this to the cops and keep it off TV and articles if other people are really involved in what happened to Michael. Anybody with nothing to hide wouldn't mind having themselves checked out by the police. But I don't think they should be talking about this on TV. Putting themselves out there on TV and in online or print articles and still being cryptic because of reprisal fears or whatever is not the way to go. They should take what they know to the authorities or hire a private investigator instead.
 
Last edited:
Because without proof, it's defamation/libel.
Without proof, they might as well tick-a-lock, in my opinion.

Almost a year, repeating the samething, and STILL no proof. I'm shocked - NOT!

I was actually waiting for one of them to say, "we have gather a bunch of EVIDENCE and have taken it to the proper authorities, it's in their hands now."

Instead of continuing to talk about the OTHERS, without saying what is being done about the others.
 
the jackson have nothing. they are full of it. talking like this makes agood story and gets them a few $ its either done with intent or stupidity. u chose
 
Because without proof, it's defamation/libel.

exactly....I think it is the hard evidence that they lack...I think people DO KNOW....not the Jackson's but others...and they are just to afraid to step forward and tell it..
 
Anyone have a link to a youtube video? I want to see his face.. I mean not like THAT, not that I think he's cute, but I just want to be able to see the expression on his face. Alot different than just reading commentary.
 
Now it's time to analyze the pieces of the puzzle we are being given today:

- Joe/Oxman against AEG (and the terrible statement of Michael being a drug addict again)
- Randy telling some of the reasons for them not trusting the will and people threatening Michael, and more people are involved

and June 14 is around the corner....

what do you think?

Some people (& I think alot of newsreporters) will consider propofol addicting so will consider 'drug addict' appropriate, although many disagree.

link:
http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/MichaelJackson/story?id=8180902&page=1
The death of Michael Jackson has brought notoriety to the powerful sedative propofol, but experts and a former addict say that if the King of Pop was addicted, his demise was only a matter of time.

I hope we learn more about people threatening MJ - it appears he was afraid of Thome - are there others?
 
it kills me inside that the one set of ppl that would tell the truth about mj prove how wonderful he was are his kids and now they are just gonna end up[ brainswashed. if htey say in the years to come that mj was adruggie then history weill be totally re written. everything that mj spent years raising will be destroyed by that family.its like its not good enough the haters one and mjs gone his own fmaily are gnna brianwash the kids. talk about revenge
 
Hard to prove when Murray had been giving MJ propofol for weeks. Randy cannot contest the will. He knew MJ couldn't stand him after everything he did in 2005...he is just seeking attention from a few not very smart fans
 
Some people (& I think alot of newsreporters) will consider propofol addicting so will consider 'drug addict' appropriate, although many disagree.

link:
http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/MichaelJackson/story?id=8180902&page=1
The death of Michael Jackson has brought notoriety to the powerful sedative propofol, but experts and a former addict say that if the King of Pop was addicted, his demise was only a matter of time.

I hope we learn more about people threatening MJ - it appears he was afraid of Thome - are there others?

yeah its called brainwashing. diprivan is not physically addictive. he ws not been given it on a regular basis and the use of the word of drug addict is pretty obvious. its used so the gen public will think he was addicted to painkillers etc.like all the other celebs who end Od ing.they will "forget" about the autopsy report. its pretty obvious what oxman and the media and some of the jacksons are trying to imply. may the got straight to hell for it
 
Anyone have a link to a youtube video? I want to see his face.. I mean not like THAT, not that I think he's cute, but I just want to be able to see the expression on his face. Alot different than just reading commentary.

[youtube]oG-7YiUTnT8[/youtube]

I believe the other parts will be online soon
 
Back
Top