yeah there were three members of the jury who later 'regretted' the verdict , two of them were negotiating a book deal even before the verdict , members of MJJforum remember there were reports on the older woman's granddaughter negotiating a book deal , she even appeared on a morning show .
once the media realised the case was much weaker than they previously thought, they started contacting family members and relatives of the jurors and offered book deals , always suggesting a guilty verdict would guarantee them much more money .
three of the jurors voted guilty initially , one woman who admitted she's a huge fan and supporter of Bill O'Rielly , she said she believed mj molested Mac, wade and Brett also ( she's an O'Reilly fan , so no surprise at all, a typical ignorant as stupid as someone can be ) and the other two as I said before were negotiating book deals even before they heard the evidence , when these three jurors were asked by the other nine to present evidence why they should have convicted mj , they had nothing and they could not back up their claims .
by the way the older woman even brought a book on pedo personality and tried to convince the jurors mj fitted perfectly the profile , that book was not admitted as evidence during the trial and it was a huge violation of the jury's instructions and could have very well resulted in a mistrial , she had obviously an agenda and even with that book she could not convince anyone to change his/her mind .
eventually the three of them could not present any facts to support the arvizos and ended agreeing with the rest of the jurors , later the two with the book deal publicly regretted their decision when they started the promotion campaign and part of the commodities offered by them were T Shirts , they were that ridiculous , the Malaysian woman her husband was also a journalist , regretted the verdict because Oreilly thought mj was guilty and she believed everything O'Reilly said .
isn't it very telling the jurors who wanted to convict were motivated by money ? they saw nothing wrong with benefiting financially from molestation accusations , probably that's why they did not find the prosecution witnesses behaviour regarding money , tabloids and ever changing stories odd .
